Bank of America, N.A. v. Sunrise Ridge Master Homeowners Association et al

Filing 83

ORDER granting ECF No. 82 Stipulation : Responses to ECF Nos. 77 , 78 , 79 Motions for Summary Judgment due by 2/22/2019. Replies due by 3/1/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 6 DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8386 SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016 AKERMAN LLP 1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Telephone: (702) 634-5000 Facsimile: (702) 380-8572 Email: darren.brenner@akerman.com Email: scott.lachman@akerman.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 AKERMAN LLP 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 11 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 12 Case No.: 2:16-cv-00467-MMD-CWH Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE 13 vs. 14 SUNRISE RIDGE MASTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; DAISEY TRUST; and NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 DAISEY TRUST, Counterclaimant, 19 20 21 vs. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Counterdefendant. 22 23 Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), defendant Sunrise Ridge Master Homeowners 24 Association (HOA), defendant Daisey Trust (Daisey Trust), and Nevada Association Services, Inc. 25 (NAS) submit this stipulation to extend the briefing deadlines to oppose motions for summary 26 judgment and to reply in support of motions for summary judgment. 27 28 1. BANA moved for summary judgment on January 18, 2019. (ECF No. 77.) /// 1 47803790;1 1 2 2. (ECF Nos. 78-79.) 3 4 3. Sunrise Ridge and Daisey Trust opposed BANA’s motion on February 8, 2019. ECF Nos. 80-81.) 5 6 Sunrise Ridge and Daisey Trust moved for summary judgment on January 22, 2019 4. The current deadline for BANA to oppose defendants’ motions for summary judgment is February 12, 2019 and to reply in support of its motion is February 22, 2019. 7 5. The parties stipulate to extend the deadline for the parties to oppose summary judgment 8 motions until February 22, 2019 and the deadline for parties to reply in support of motions for 9 summary judgment until March 1, 2019. 10 6. The continuance is requested because the parties’ counsel are currently drafting briefs AKERMAN LLP 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 11 in numerous HOA foreclosure cases and need additional time to adequately respond to the arguments 12 in the motions and oppositions. 13 /// 14 /// 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 47803790;1 1 7. This is the first request for extension of these deadlines. 2 Dated this 11th day of February, 2019. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AKERMAN LLP MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ., LTD. /s/ Scott R. Lachman,Esq. DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8386 SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016 1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200 Telephone: (702) 634-5000 Facsimile: (702) 380-8572 Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A. /s/ Adam R. Trippiedi, Esq. MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1641 ADAM R. TRIPPIEDI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12294 2260 Corporate Circle, Suite 480 Henderson, NV 89074 Attorneys for Defendant Daisey Trust 10 AKERMAN LLP 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 11 LIPSON NEILSON, P.C. 12 /s/ J. William Ebert, Esq. JOSEPH P. GARIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6653 J. WILLIAM EBERT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 2697 MEGAN H. HUMMEL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12414 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Attorneys for Defendant Sunrise Ridge Master Homeowners Association 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 February 11, 2019 DATED:______________________________ 24 25 26 27 28 3 47803790;1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?