The Bank of New York Mellon, v. Las Vegas Development Group LLC, et al
Filing
95
ORDER Granting 94 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 87 Motion to Amend. Responses due by 4/12/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROGER P. CROTEAU, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4958
TIMOTHY E. RHODA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7878
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
9120 West Post Road, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
(702) 254-7775
(702) 228-7719 (facsimile)
croteaulaw@croteaulaw.com
Attorney for Defendants
LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
AND AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
***
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK NA AS TRUSTEE
FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE
INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR STEARNS
ALT-A TRUST 2005-9, MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-9,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs.
)
)
LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, )
a Nevada limited-liability company; ROYAL )
HIGHLANDS STREET AND LANDSCAPE )
MAINTENANCE CORPORATION, a Nevada )
non-profit corporation; ALESSI & KOENIG, )
LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company; and )
AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Nevada )
limited-liability company,
)
)
Defendants. )
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00478-JCM-GWF
23
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 59(e)
(Second Request)
25
COMES NOW Plaintiff, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF
26
NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA AS
27
TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR
28
Page 1 of 4
10912 Fishers Island
1
STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2005-9, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
2
SERIES 2005-9, and Defendants, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC and LAS VEGAS
3
DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate
4
and agree as follows:
5
1.
On March 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under
6
FRCP 59(e) herein [ECF #87]. Responses to said Motion were originally due on
7
March 19, 2019.
8
2.
to the subject motion until April 2, 2019. [ECF #88]. Said stipulation was
9
approved on March 21, 2019. [ECF #90].
10
11
On March 19, 2019, the parties submitted a stipulation to extend time to respond
3.
The prior extension was based in part upon the fact that Defendants’ counsel was
12
required to serve on jury duty. Subsequent to being released from jury duty,
13
counsel had a backlog of work obligations. To date, counsel has been unable to
14
complete the response to the subject motion.
15
4.
Based upon the foregoing, Defendants have requested and shall be granted an
16
additional extension of time until April 12, 2019, in which to respond to the
17
Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under FRCP 59(e).
18
5.
19
Dated this
20
21
This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.
2nd
day of April, 2019.
ROGER P. CROTEAU &
ASSOCIATES, LTD.
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
/s/ Timothy E. Rhoda
TIMOTHY E. RHODA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7878
9120 West Post Road, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
(702) 254-7775
croteaulaw@croteaulaw.com
Attorney for Defendants
Las Vegas Development Group, LLC
and Airmotive Investments, LLC
/s/ Blakeley E. Griffith
BLAKELEY E. GRIFFITH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12386
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
702-784-5200
702-784-5252 (fax)
bgriffith@swlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Bank of New York Mellon
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 4
10912 Fishers Island
1
2
3
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO ALTER
OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 59(E) (Second Request)
2:16-cv-00478-JCM-GWF
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
By:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
Dated:
April 3, 2019
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 4
10912 Fishers Island
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this
2nd
day of April, 2019, I served via the
United States District Court CM/ECF electronic filing system, the foregoing STIPULATION
AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO ALTER OR
AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 59(E) (Second Request) to the following parties:
Holly Cheong
Snell & Wilmer LLP
Suite 1100
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy
Las Vegas, NV 89169
702-784-5200
702-784-5252 (fax)
hcheong@swlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Bank of New York Mellon
Ryan D Hastings
Leach Johnson Song & Gruchow
8945 W. Russell Road
Las Vegas, NV 89148
702-538-9074
702-538-9113 (fax)
rhastings@leachjohnson.com
Attorney for Defendant
Royal Highlands Street and Landscape
Maintenance Corporation
Blakeley E. Griffith
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
702-784-5200
702-784-5252 (fax)
bgriffith@swlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Bank of New York Mellon
Amy F. Sorenson
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
3883 Howard Highes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
801-257-1907
801-257-1800 (fax)
asorenson@swlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Bank of New York Mellon
Andrew M. Jacobs
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
One South Church Avenue
Tucson, AZ 85701
520-882-1207
520-884-1294 (fax)
ajacobs@swlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Bank of New York Mellon
Jeanette E. McPherson
Schwartzer & McPherson Law Firm
2850 South Jones Boulevard
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89146
702-228-7590
702-892-0122 (fax)
bkfilings@s-mlaw.com
Attorney for Interested Party
Chapter 7 Trustee Shelley D. Krohn
Wayne O. Klomp, Pvt
Snell & Winter, LLP
50 W. Liberty Street
Reno, NV 89501
(775) 785-5440
(775) 785-5441 (fax)
wklomp@swlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Bank of New York Mellon
Steven T. Loizzi, Jr.
Alessi & Koenig, LLC
9500 West Flamingo Road, Suite 205
Las Vegas, NV 89147-5721
(702) 222-4033
(702) 222-4043 (fax)
steve@alessikoenig.com
Attorney for Defendant
Alessi & Koenig, LLC
/s/ Timothy E. Rhoda
An employee of ROGER P. CROTEAU &
ASSOCIATES, LTD.
28
Page 4 of 4
10912 Fishers Island
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?