The Bank of New York Mellon, v. Las Vegas Development Group LLC, et al

Filing 95

ORDER Granting 94 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 87 Motion to Amend. Responses due by 4/12/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROGER P. CROTEAU, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4958 TIMOTHY E. RHODA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7878 ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 9120 West Post Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 (702) 254-7775 (702) 228-7719 (facsimile) croteaulaw@croteaulaw.com Attorney for Defendants LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC AND AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 *** 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2005-9, MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-9, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, ) a Nevada limited-liability company; ROYAL ) HIGHLANDS STREET AND LANDSCAPE ) MAINTENANCE CORPORATION, a Nevada ) non-profit corporation; ALESSI & KOENIG, ) LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company; and ) AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Nevada ) limited-liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-00478-JCM-GWF 23 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 59(e) (Second Request) 25 COMES NOW Plaintiff, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF 26 NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA AS 27 TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR 28 Page 1 of 4 10912 Fishers Island 1 STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2005-9, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, 2 SERIES 2005-9, and Defendants, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC and LAS VEGAS 3 DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate 4 and agree as follows: 5 1. On March 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under 6 FRCP 59(e) herein [ECF #87]. Responses to said Motion were originally due on 7 March 19, 2019. 8 2. to the subject motion until April 2, 2019. [ECF #88]. Said stipulation was 9 approved on March 21, 2019. [ECF #90]. 10 11 On March 19, 2019, the parties submitted a stipulation to extend time to respond 3. The prior extension was based in part upon the fact that Defendants’ counsel was 12 required to serve on jury duty. Subsequent to being released from jury duty, 13 counsel had a backlog of work obligations. To date, counsel has been unable to 14 complete the response to the subject motion. 15 4. Based upon the foregoing, Defendants have requested and shall be granted an 16 additional extension of time until April 12, 2019, in which to respond to the 17 Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under FRCP 59(e). 18 5. 19 Dated this 20 21 This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay. 2nd day of April, 2019. ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. /s/ Timothy E. Rhoda TIMOTHY E. RHODA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7878 9120 West Post Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 (702) 254-7775 croteaulaw@croteaulaw.com Attorney for Defendants Las Vegas Development Group, LLC and Airmotive Investments, LLC /s/ Blakeley E. Griffith BLAKELEY E. GRIFFITH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12386 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 702-784-5200 702-784-5252 (fax) bgriffith@swlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 4 10912 Fishers Island 1 2 3 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 59(E) (Second Request) 2:16-cv-00478-JCM-GWF IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 By: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 Dated: April 3, 2019 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 4 10912 Fishers Island 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 2nd day of April, 2019, I served via the United States District Court CM/ECF electronic filing system, the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER FRCP 59(E) (Second Request) to the following parties: Holly Cheong Snell & Wilmer LLP Suite 1100 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy Las Vegas, NV 89169 702-784-5200 702-784-5252 (fax) hcheong@swlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon Ryan D Hastings Leach Johnson Song & Gruchow 8945 W. Russell Road Las Vegas, NV 89148 702-538-9074 702-538-9113 (fax) rhastings@leachjohnson.com Attorney for Defendant Royal Highlands Street and Landscape Maintenance Corporation Blakeley E. Griffith Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 702-784-5200 702-784-5252 (fax) bgriffith@swlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon Amy F. Sorenson Snell & Wilmer, LLP 3883 Howard Highes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 801-257-1907 801-257-1800 (fax) asorenson@swlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon Andrew M. Jacobs Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. One South Church Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 520-882-1207 520-884-1294 (fax) ajacobs@swlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon Jeanette E. McPherson Schwartzer & McPherson Law Firm 2850 South Jones Boulevard Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89146 702-228-7590 702-892-0122 (fax) bkfilings@s-mlaw.com Attorney for Interested Party Chapter 7 Trustee Shelley D. Krohn Wayne O. Klomp, Pvt Snell & Winter, LLP 50 W. Liberty Street Reno, NV 89501 (775) 785-5440 (775) 785-5441 (fax) wklomp@swlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon Steven T. Loizzi, Jr. Alessi & Koenig, LLC 9500 West Flamingo Road, Suite 205 Las Vegas, NV 89147-5721 (702) 222-4033 (702) 222-4043 (fax) steve@alessikoenig.com Attorney for Defendant Alessi & Koenig, LLC /s/ Timothy E. Rhoda An employee of ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 28 Page 4 of 4 10912 Fishers Island

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?