Albanese v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
Filing
5
ORDER adopting and affirming ECF No. 4 Report and Recommendation and dismissing ECF No. 3 Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
GRACE ALBANESE
9
Plaintiff ,
Case No. 2:16-CV-00529-KJD-NJK
10
v.
11
ORDER
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS,
12
13
Defendant.
14
15
Presently before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#4) of
16
Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe entered on April 4, 2016 recommending that Plaintiff’s case be
17
dismissed without prejudice. No objection was filed.
18
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28
19
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation (#4)
20
of the United States Magistrate Judge entered April 4, 2016, should be ADOPTED and
21
AFFIRMED. The Magistrate Judge screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
22
Docket No. 3 and found that Plaintiff’s complaint was deficient in several ways. On March 11, 2016,
23
the Magistrate dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint,
24
requiring that an amended complaint be filed no later than April 1, 2016. The Magistrate indicated
25
that “[f]ailure to comply with this order will result in the recommended dismissal of this case.” To
26
date, no amended complaint or any request to extend the deadline for filing one has been filed.
1
2
3
4
Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (#4) entered April 4, 2016, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (#3) is DISMISSED without
prejudice.
5
6
7
DATED this _______ day of June 2016
20th
8
9
10
11
12
13
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?