Bank of America, N.A. v. Mountain Gate Homeowners' Association et al
Filing
57
ORDER - The order to show cause (ECF No. 16 is DISCHARGED. Attorney Michael Bohn is CAUTIONED that repeating conduct (specified herein) in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/13/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
8
9
10
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
MOUNTAIN GATE HOMEOWNERS’
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00540-JCM-NJK
ORDER
13
Pending before the Court is an order for the parties to show cause why the case should not be
14
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Docket No. 16. The Court is now satisfied that a
15
sufficient basis exists for diversity jurisdiction and, therefore, the order to show cause is
16
DISCHARGED.
17
At the same time, the Court’s efforts to determine subject matter jurisdiction in this matter were
18
obstructed by Saticoy Bay and its counsel, Michael Bohn. The Court is especially troubled by the
19
conduct of Mr. Bohn, who has made inconsistent statements to the Court and failed to properly prepare
20
for hearings or research the basis for filings he has submitted. The Court is also troubled by Mr. Bohn’s
21
submission of declarations from his client that (1) were not read by his client and (2) were not based on
22
the personal knowledge of his client despite the contrary representation in the declarations themselves.
23
That is not the conduct the Court expects from attorneys. Mr. Bohn is CAUTIONED that repeating
24
such conduct in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: June 13, 2016
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?