Mehmood v. Solander et al

Filing 10

ORDER that 8 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Yasir Mehmood's case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
YASIR MEHMOOD,
4
5
6

Plaintiff,
vs.
NICOLE SOLANDER, et al.,

7
8
9

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00541-GMN-CWH
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States

10

Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman, (ECF No. 8), which recommends that Yasir Mehmood’s,

11

(“Plaintiff”), case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the

12

Court’s Order to update his address, (ECF No. 6).

13

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a

14

United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);

15

D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo

16

determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,

17

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

18

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is

19

not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an

20

objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized

21

that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

22

where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

23

1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

24
25

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. Further, each order
entered and mailed to the Plaintiff in this case has been returned by the United States Postal

Page 1 of 2

1

Service as undeliverable. (See ECF Nos. 5, 7, 9). Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, a “pro se party must

2

immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address…” and

3

“[f]ailure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default

4

judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.”

5

Accordingly,

6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 8), is

7
8
9

ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Yasir Mehmood’s case is DISMISSED
without prejudice.

10

The Clerk of Court shall close this case and enter judgment accordingly.

11

14
DATED this ________ day of June, 2018.

12
13
14

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2