Makransky v. Doto et al
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this order to respond to 50 defendant's motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall have seven (7) days from the date the response is filed to submit a reply Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:16-CV-563 JCM (CWH)
DAVID DOTO, et al.,
Presently before the court is defendant Jenna Wells-Doto’s emergency motion to stay the
enforcement of plaintiff’s granted motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 34). (ECF No. 50).
Specifically, defendant asks that this court allow a stay of discovery until the adjudication of her
objection (ECF No. 39) to the magistrate judge’s decision to grant plaintiff’s motion to compel
(ECF No. 34).
This court finds that this motion is properly understood as a motion made pursuant to Local
Rule IB 3-1 because the magistrate judge has already denied the defendant’s request to stay
discovery until the adjudication of her objection, and defendant now asks this court to do the same.
(ECF Nos. 47, 50). Under that rule, opposing parties have the opportunity to respond. LR IB 3-1.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff shall have
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
fourteen (14) days from the date of this order to respond to defendant’s motion (ECF No. 50).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall have seven (7) days from the date the
response is filed to submit a reply.
DATED January 5, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?