U.S. Bank N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1 LLC

Filing 25

ORDER that 7 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must submit a bond pursuant to this Order in the amount of $500.00 as to Defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00576-GMN-NJK
ORDER

9
10

Pending before the Court is a Motion for Demand for Security of Costs, (ECF No.

11

7), filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“Defendant”), to which Plaintiff

12

U.S. Bank National Association (“Plaintiff”) filed a Notice of Non-Opposition, (ECF No.

13

10). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is granted.

14

The Ninth Circuit recognizes that “federal district courts have inherent power to

15

require plaintiffs to post security for costs.” Simulnet E. Assocs. v. Ramada Hotel

16

Operating Co., 37 F.3d 573, 574 (9th Cir. 1994). Under Nevada law, “[w]hen a plaintiff

17

in an action resides out of the State, or is a foreign corporation, security for the costs and

18

charges which may be awarded against such plaintiff may be required by the defendant.”

19

NRS § 18.130(1). “After the lapse of 30 days from the service of notice that security is

20

required . . . upon proof thereof, and that no undertaking as required has been filed, the

21

court or judge may order the action to be dismissed.” NRS § 18.130(4). It is the policy of

22

the United States District Court for the District of Nevada to enforce the requirements of

23

NRS § 18.130 in diversity actions. See, e.g., Feagins v. Trump Org., No. 2:11-cv-01121-

24

GMN, 2012 WL 925027, at *1 (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2012).

25

Page 1 of 2

1

Because Plaintiff resides outside of Nevada, (Compl. ¶ 2, ECF No. 1), the Court

2

finds that it is appropriate to require Plaintiff to post a security bond of $500.00 in this

3

matter pursuant to NRS § 18.130.

4

IV.

5
6
7

CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion Demanding Security of Costs, (ECF

No. 7), is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must submit a bond pursuant to this

8

Order in the amount of $500.00 as to Defendant. Failure to do so within thirty days of

9

the filing date of this Order shall constitute grounds for dismissal.

10

3
DATED this _____ day of October, 2016.

11
12
13
14

__________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2