Michaels v. Lynch et al

Filing 39

ORDER Granting 38 Motion to Extend Time re 19 Motion to Dismiss. ( Replies due by 11/16/2016.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00578-JAD-PAL Document 38 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 John R. Tyler Assistant Branch Director Daniel Riess Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 353-3098 Facsimile: (202) 616-8460 Email: Daniel.Riess@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA BARRY MICHAELS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No: 2:16-cv-00578-JAD-PAL ) v. ) ) ORDER LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the ) United States, in her official capacity; and ) THOMAS E. BRANDON, Deputy Director, ) Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ) Explosives, in his official capacity, ) 15 Defendants. 16 DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 17 18 19 20 21 Defendants hereby move for an extension of time up to and including November 16, 2016 in which to file their reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss. 1 The current deadline is October 17, 2016. Plaintiff’s counsel has consented to the extension of time. In support of this motion, Defendants state as follows: 22 23 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff’s response to the motion to dismiss incorporated a cross-motion to amend the complaint. See ECF No. 35. For the sake of simplicity, Defendants plan to combine their reply brief supporting the motion to dismiss with a response to Plaintiff’s cross-motion to amend. The requested extension therefore also includes Defendants’ response to the cross-motion to amend. 1 Case 2:16-cv-00578-JAD-PAL Document 38 Filed 10/14/16 Page 2 of 3 1 Defendants require additional time because of the press of business and scheduling conflicts, 2 including summary judgment briefing this month on an accelerated schedule. This motion is not 3 sought merely for delay but in order that justice may be served. 4 5 6 Based on the foregoing, Defendants respectfully request that their unopposed motion for an extension of time be granted. Respectfully submitted this 14th day of October 2016. 7 JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Branch Director, Federal Programs Branch 8 9 /s/ Daniel Riess DANIEL RIESS Trial Attorney 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 17, 2016. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 DATED: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?