Florence v. Cenlar Federal Savings and Loan et al

Filing 114

ORDER to Strike Docs. 50,51,53-63,66-73,78-98,100-109. No later than 4/28/2017, parties are to file their summary judgment motions, briefing and exhibits and joint motions to seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 REGINA FLORENCE, 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 vs. 10 CENLAR FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-00587-GMN-NJK ORDER 13 Pending before the Court are five motions for summary judgment and twelve related motions 14 to seal. Docket Nos. 50, 51 , 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 66, 78, 79, 80, 81, 100, 101, 106, 107. Through the 15 motions to seal, the parties have sought to seal 40 separate filings, including the subparts thereto. See 16 Docket Nos. 51, 53, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 17 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 102, 103, 104, 105, 108, 109. On March 20, 2017, the Court 18 issued an order outlining the governing standards established by the Ninth Circuit and requiring a 19 supplement with respect to two of the motions to seal, while deferring ruling on the other ten motions 20 to seal. Docket No. 111. On March 30, 2017, the Court held a telephonic hearing regarding logistical 21 challenges in complying with the Court’s order. As stated on the record, rather than working through 22 those issues based on the currently-filed documents, counsel for both parties and the Court agreed that 23 the better course is to strike the currently-filed documents from the record (maintaining them under seal) 24 and having counsel file amended versions of those documents that may omit unnecessary exhibit pages. 25 Counsel and the Court also agreed that counsel should have an opportunity to confer prior to filing 26 renewed motions to seal so that each side may evaluate whether sealing is appropriate, submit 27 appropriate factual support with any renewed motion to seal, and otherwise streamline the process of 28 renewing and adjudicating motions to seal. 1 Based on the circumstances, the Court therefore ORDERS as follows: 2 • The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to STRIKE from the record Docket Nos. 50, 51, 3 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 78, 79, 80, 81, 4 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 5 105, 106, 107, 108 and 109. 6 • 7 8 under seal. • 9 10 Having been stricken, the Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to maintain these documents The parties are ORDERED to engage in the meet-and-confer process as identified on the record at the telephonic hearing. • The parties are ORDERED to file, no later than April 28, 2017, their summary judgment 11 motions, subsequent briefing, and exhibits thereto. Those filings may omit portions of 12 exhibits that are unnecessary to the resolution of the summary judgment motions, and 13 may also alter citations as necessary based thereon. No substantive changes may be 14 made to the motions or briefs. 15 • The parties are ORDERED to file, no later than April 28, 2017, joint motions to seal 16 related to the refiled motions, briefs, and exhibits. Such joint motions shall comport with 17 the standards and guidance provided in Docket No. 111, including that they must identify 18 with particularity by page and line the information for which a party or parties contend 19 information exists that should be sealed under the “compelling reasons” standard. 20 Moreover, any sealing requests shall be narrowly tailored, shall include reference to 21 specific factual support, and shall include meaningfully developed argument as to why 22 the “compelling reasons” standard has been met for each particular reference at issue. 23 To the extent applicable, any sealing requests shall also make clear why the sealing of 24 an entire document is appropriate rather than redaction. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: March 30, 2017 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?