Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P. v. Nebel et al
ORDER and JUDGMENT Adopting 124 Proposed Judgment (See Order for Details). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should plaintiff seek attorneys' fees, it shall submit a corresponding motion requesting that relief within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) Modified on 6/15/2017 (JM).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SECURITY ALARM FINANCING
ENTERPRISES, L.P. d/b/a SAFEGUARD
Case No. 2:16-CV-592 JCM (VCF)
MIKAYLA NEBEL, et al.,
Presently before the court is plaintiff Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P.’s
proposed final judgment in a civil action and permanent injunction. (ECF No. 124). This court
has reviewed and will adopt the proposed judgment, with two caveats: (1) this court clarifies that
it received the transferred action on March 17, 2016, (ECF No. 55) and; (2) plaintiff has not
presented sufficient proof for its calculation of requested attorneys’ fees, which are permissible
under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). See Gracie v. Gracie, 217 F.3d 1060, 1070 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[T]he
district court also erred by not developing an adequate record to establish the reasonableness of
the total fee award.”); see also Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. Ct.
1749, 1756 (2014) (defining the term “exceptional,” with reference to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a)).
Therefore, the court will grant the relief requested in the proposed final judgment and
reiterated below, with the exception of the $24,978.95 requested for attorneys’ fees. (ECF No.
Should plaintiff seek attorneys’ fees pursuant to § 1117(a), it will file a corresponding
motion for attorneys’ fees within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. That motion must
comply with Local Rule 54-14. See Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Pahrump 194, LLC, No. 2:12-
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
cv-1462-JCM-VCF, 2017 WL 536837, at *2 (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2017) (denying a motion for
attorneys’ fees for failure to strictly adhere to Local Rule 54-14).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s proposed
judgment (ECF No. 124) be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED in accordance with the foregoing,
and the following remedies shall be GRANTED:
1. Statutory damages in the amount of $30,000;
2. Costs in the amount of $426.87;
3. Post-judgment interest on the principal sum at the judgment rate from the date of
entry of the Judgment until paid in full; and
4. “Niggemyer, and his agents, servants, employees, confederates, attorneys, and
any persons acting in concert or participation having knowledge of this Order
by service or actual notice . . . are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained
from using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the
SAFE Marks in commerce including, without limitation:  by selling, offering
for sale, distributing, promoting, or advertising any good or service in
connection with such reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of
the SAFE Marks.”
(ECF No. 124 at 4–5).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should plaintiff seek attorneys’ fees, it shall submit a
corresponding motion requesting that relief within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order.
DATED June 14, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?