Lige v. Clark County et al

Filing 107

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 106 the parties' stipulation to extend deadlines is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until Wednesday, 7/26/17 to file her Response to 100 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant shall have an additional 14 days in which to file its Reply. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DAN M. WINDER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 1569
SCOTT C. DORMAN, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 13108
KRISTINA MILETOVIC, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 14089
LAW OFFICE OF DAN M. WINDER, P.C.
3507 W. Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11

JOHN LIGE, an individual,

12
13

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-(PAL)
Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND DEADLINE
FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF
No.100) AND TO EXTEND THE TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

vs.

14
15
16

CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Nevada; DOES I-V; and ROES VIX,

17
18

Defendants.

19

[FIRST REQUEST]

20

[ECF No. 106]

21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff John Lige and

22

Defendant Clark County, by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, that

23

Plaintiff shall have seven (7) additional days to file and serve his Response to Defendant Clark

24

County’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 100), filed June 28, 2017. The parties agree

25

the deadline for filing Plaintiff’s Response shall now be Wednesday, July 26, 2017.

26

Plaintiff requests the instant short extension due to the sheer amount of documents

27

(multiple thousands) being reviewed in responding to the Motion, the coordination of obtaining

28

1

1

affidavits in support of Plaintiff’s response, Plaintiff’s preparation and submission today of his

2

Reply to Motion to Compel (ECF No. 103) in this matter, and Counsel Dan Winder for Plaintiff

3

being out of state for two different legal matters within the last two weeks. This is the first request

4

to extend the deadline to file a response to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

5

IT IS ALSO HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant shall have an

6

additional 14 days in which to file its Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment. Counsel

7

for Defendant is preparing a Motion for Summary Judgment in Mankel v. GEICO, 3:16-cv-657-

8

HDM-VPC. Further counsel for Defendant is preparing for a private mediation set to begin August

9

14, 2016.

10

This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of undue delay.

11

Dated this 17th day of July, 2017.

12
13

Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

14

__/s/ Kristina Miletovic for Dan Winder___
DAN M. WINDER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 1569
SCOTT C. DORMAN, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 13108
KRISTINA MILETOVIC, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 14089
3507 W. Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff

__/s/ Danielle C. Miller_______________
ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 3062
DANIELLE C. MILLER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 9127
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendant Clark County

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

ORDER
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' stipulation to extend
deadlines [ECF No. 106] is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until Wednesday, July 26, 2017 to
file her Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 100) and Defendant
shall have an additional 14 days in which to file its Reply.

25
26
27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28

DATED: July 18, 2017
2