Lige v. Clark County et al

Filing 50

ORDER Granting 49 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond re 39 , 43 44 MOTIONS to Dismiss. Response deadline is 7/21/16. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/14/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL Document 49 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DAN M. WINDER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 1569
ARNOLD WEINSTOCK, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 810
SCOTT C. DORMAN, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 13108
LAW OFFICE OF DAN M. WINDER, P.C.
3507 W. Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

JOHN LIGE, an individual,

12
13
14
15
16
17

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-(PAL)
Plaintiff,

vs.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY’S
CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. #39),
the State of Nevada, SERVICE EMPLOYEES DEFENDANT SEIU’S JOINDER
INTERNATIONAL UNION, Local 1107, (Dkt.
#42),
DEFENDANT
SEIU’S
labor union; DOES I-V; and ROES VI-X,
MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkt. #43 & #44),
AND DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY’S
Defendants.
JOINDERS (Dkt. #47 & #48)

18
[FIRST REQUEST]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff John Lige, by and though his counsel of record, The Law Office of Dan M.
Winder, P.C., Defendant Service Employees International Union, Local 1107 (“SEIU”), by and
through its counsel of record, The Urban Law Firm, and Defendant Clark County, by and
through its counsel of record, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, hereby stipulate and agree
that Plaintiff be allowed up to and including July 21, 2016 to file his response to:
1. Defendant CLARK COUNTY’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #39), filed June 27, 2016,
and Defendant SEIU’s Joinder to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #42), filed July 1, 2016
1

Case 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL Document 49 Filed 07/14/16 Page 2 of 3

1
2

2. Defendant SEIU’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #43), filed July 1, 2016, and Defendant
CLARK COUNTY’s Joinder (Dkt. 47), filed July 5, 2016.

3

3. Defendant SEIU’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #44), filed July 1, 2016, and Defendant
CLARK COUNTY’s Joinder (Dkt. 48), filed July 5, 2016.

4

Plaintiff requests the instant extension because he needs additional time to properly

5

respond to the numerous complex issues raised, because Plaintiff’s counsel has an uncommonly

6

large amount of deadlines concentrated during this time period, and because Mr. Winder has

7

been out of state tending to a criminal matter. This is Plaintiff’s first requested extension of this

8

deadline and is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Dated this 14th day of July, 2016.
Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

__/s/ Arnold Weinstock____________
DAN M. WINDER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 1569
ARNOLD WEINSTOCK, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 810
SCOTT C. DORMAN, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 13108
3507 W. Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff
The Urban Law Firm

__/s/ Danielle C. Miller______________
ROBERT W. FREEMAN, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 3062
DANIELLE C. MILLER, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 9127
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Attorney for Defendant Clark County

__/s/ Sean W. McDonald____________
MICHAEL A. URBAN, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 3875
SEAN W. MCDONALD, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 12817
4270 S. Decatur Blvd., Suite A-9
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Attorney for Defendant SEIU
ORDER

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: July 14, 2016.
Dated this ___ day of ___________________, 2016.

26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2