Lige v. Clark County et al

Filing 74

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that a temporary protective order is entered precluding the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition set for 10/18/16 from going forward as scheduled pending a decision on the merits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on 68 the Emergency Motion for Protective Order is scheduled for 11/17/2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 3B. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 JOHN LIGE, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. CLARK COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 11 12 Case No. 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL Before the court is Defendant Clark County’s Emergency Motion for Protective Order 13 (ECF No. 68), and supporting Declaration (ECF No 69). 14 disputes about requests for production of documents and a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice 15 served by counsel for Plaintiff. It was filed as an emergency motion because the Rule 30(b)(6) 16 notice is set for October 18, 2016. The parties have also applied for and received an extension of 17 the discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines. See Stipulation and Order (ECF Nos. 66, 70). 18 Having reviewed the matter, The motion involves discovery 19 IT IS ORDERED that: 20 1. A temporary protective order is entered precluding the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition set 21 for October 18, 2016 from going forward as scheduled pending a decision on the 22 merits. 23 24 25 2. A hearing on the Emergency Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 68) is scheduled for November 17, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 3B. DATED this 12th day of October, 2016. 26 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?