Lige v. Clark County et al

Filing 79

ORDER Granting 78 Stipulation of Dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Service Employees International Union, Local 1107 are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. This case moves forward against Defendant Clark County only. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL Document 78 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 THE URBAN LAW FIRM Michael A. Urban, Nevada Bar No. 3875 Sean W. McDonald, Nevada Bar No. 12817 4270 S. Decatur Blvd., Suite A-9 Las Vegas, Nevada 89103 T: (702) 968-8087 F: (702) 968-8088 murban@theurbanlawfirm.com smcdonald@theurbanlawfirm.com Counsel for Defendant SEIU Local 1107 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JOHN LIGE, an individual; Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 Case No.: 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1107 vs. CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1107, labor union, DOES I-V; and ROES VI-X, ECF No. 78 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, John Lige, by and through his counsel of record, Law Office of Dan Winder, 18 P.C.; Defendant, Service Employees International Union, Local 1107 (“Local 1107”), by and 19 through its counsel of record, The Urban Law Firm; and Defendant, Clark County, by and 20 through its counsel of record, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, hereby stipulate and agree 21 as follows, subject to the approval and Order of the Court: 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. A full and final settlement of the above-entitled action has been entered into and agreed to by Plaintiff and Local 1107. 2. Plaintiff and Local 1107 have executed a Settlement Agreement setting forth the terms of their settlement. 3. The Court approved the settlement as a good faith settlement on October 25, 2016 (ECF No. 60). 28 1 Case 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL Document 78 Filed 11/15/16 Page 2 of 3 1 4. Therefore, the parties do hereby request that this action be dismissed with 2 prejudice as to Local 1107 only, with each side (Plaintiff and Local 1107) to bear its own 3 attorney’s fees and costs. 4 5 5. In light of the approval of the settlement as a good faith settlement, Defendant Clark County consents to the dismissal with prejudice of Local 1107 from this action. 6 Dated this 15th day of November, 2016. Dated this 14th day of November, 2016. 7 THE URBAN LAW FIRM LAW OFFICE OF DAN WINDER, P.C. 8 By: /s/ Sean W. McDonald Michael A. Urban, NV Bar No. 3875 Sean W. McDonald, NV Bar No. 12817 4270 S. Decatur Blvd., Suite A-9 Las Vegas, Nevada 89103 Counsel for Defendant SEIU Local 1107 By: /s/ Kristina Miletovic Dan M. Winder, Esq., NV Bar No. 001569 Arnold Weinstock, Esq., NV Bar No. 00810 Scott C. Dorman, Esq., NV Bar No. 013108 Matthew J. Peirce, Esq., NV Bar No. 006449 Kristina Miletovic, Esq., NV Bar No. 014089 3507 E. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89102 Counsel for Plaintiff 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dated this 15th day of November, 2016. 15 16 17 18 19 20 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP By: /s/ Danielle C. Miller Robert W. Freeman, NV Bar No. 3062 Danielle C. Miller, NV Bar No. 9127 6385 S Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Attorneys for Defendant Clark County 21 /// 22 /// 23 24 ORDER Based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 78] and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Service Employees International /// Union, Local 1107 are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and / /costs. This case moves forward against Defendant Clark County only. / 25 26 27 _____________________________ ________________ _ ___ _ ____ Jennifer Dorsey, U.S. District Judge r Dors U.S. Dis Dorsey, S D November 16, 2016 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?