Lige v. Clark County et al
Filing
79
ORDER Granting 78 Stipulation of Dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Service Employees International Union, Local 1107 are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. This case moves forward against Defendant Clark County only. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL Document 78 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
THE URBAN LAW FIRM
Michael A. Urban, Nevada Bar No. 3875
Sean W. McDonald, Nevada Bar No. 12817
4270 S. Decatur Blvd., Suite A-9
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
T: (702) 968-8087
F: (702) 968-8088
murban@theurbanlawfirm.com
smcdonald@theurbanlawfirm.com
Counsel for Defendant SEIU Local 1107
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
JOHN LIGE, an individual;
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO
DEFENDANT SERVICE EMPLOYEES
INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1107
vs.
CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Nevada; and SERVICE
EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,
LOCAL 1107, labor union, DOES I-V; and
ROES VI-X,
ECF No. 78
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, John Lige, by and through his counsel of record, Law Office of Dan Winder,
18
P.C.; Defendant, Service Employees International Union, Local 1107 (“Local 1107”), by and
19
through its counsel of record, The Urban Law Firm; and Defendant, Clark County, by and
20
through its counsel of record, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, hereby stipulate and agree
21
as follows, subject to the approval and Order of the Court:
22
23
24
25
26
27
1.
A full and final settlement of the above-entitled action has been entered into and
agreed to by Plaintiff and Local 1107.
2.
Plaintiff and Local 1107 have executed a Settlement Agreement setting forth the
terms of their settlement.
3.
The Court approved the settlement as a good faith settlement on October 25, 2016
(ECF No. 60).
28
1
Case 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL Document 78 Filed 11/15/16 Page 2 of 3
1
4.
Therefore, the parties do hereby request that this action be dismissed with
2
prejudice as to Local 1107 only, with each side (Plaintiff and Local 1107) to bear its own
3
attorney’s fees and costs.
4
5
5.
In light of the approval of the settlement as a good faith settlement, Defendant
Clark County consents to the dismissal with prejudice of Local 1107 from this action.
6
Dated this 15th day of November, 2016.
Dated this 14th day of November, 2016.
7
THE URBAN LAW FIRM
LAW OFFICE OF DAN WINDER, P.C.
8
By:
/s/ Sean W. McDonald
Michael A. Urban, NV Bar No. 3875
Sean W. McDonald, NV Bar No. 12817
4270 S. Decatur Blvd., Suite A-9
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Counsel for Defendant SEIU Local 1107
By:
/s/ Kristina Miletovic
Dan M. Winder, Esq., NV Bar No. 001569
Arnold Weinstock, Esq., NV Bar No. 00810
Scott C. Dorman, Esq., NV Bar No. 013108
Matthew J. Peirce, Esq., NV Bar No. 006449
Kristina Miletovic, Esq., NV Bar No. 014089
3507 E. Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Counsel for Plaintiff
9
10
11
12
13
14
Dated this 15th day of November, 2016.
15
16
17
18
19
20
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
By:
/s/ Danielle C. Miller
Robert W. Freeman, NV Bar No. 3062
Danielle C. Miller, NV Bar No. 9127
6385 S Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89118
Attorneys for Defendant Clark County
21
///
22
///
23
24
ORDER
Based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 78] and good cause appearing, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Service Employees International
///
Union, Local 1107 are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and
/ /costs. This case moves forward against Defendant Clark County only.
/
25
26
27
_____________________________
________________
_ ___ _ ____
Jennifer Dorsey, U.S. District Judge
r Dors U.S. Dis
Dorsey, S D
November 16, 2016
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?