Tuuamalemalo v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 24

ORDER Granting 22 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 20 MOTION to Strike. Plaintiff's Responses due by 4/14/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:16-cv-00619-JAD-VCF Document 22 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
POTTER LAW OFFICES
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ian Tuuamalemalo

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

IAN TUUAMALEMALO,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No.

2:16-cv-619-JAD-VCF

Plaintiff,
vs.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a Political Subdivision
of the STATE OF NEVADA; OFFICER
S. MPHILLIPS P#8903, individually;
OFFICER S. GREEN P#8918, individually;
SGT. TOM JENKINS P#4456; and THREE
NAMED UNKNOWN LAS VEGAS
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICERS, individually;

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
PLAINTIFF’S REBUTTAL
EXPERT REPORT
(First Request)
ECF No. 22

Defendants.

20
21

COMES NOW, the above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel

22

of record, and hereby agree, jointly stipulate that the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’

23

Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Rebuttal Expert Report [ECF 20] filed on March 17, 2017, currently

24

due March 31, 2017, be extended an additional fourteen (14) days up to and including Friday,

25

April 14, 2017.

26

Although Plaintiff’s counsel has been actively working on responding to Defendants’

27

Motion, Plaintiff’s counsel has been unable to complete the Response. Since the filing of

28

Defendants’ Motion, Plaintiff’s counsel has had a Ninth Circuit brief due, six (6) depositions,

Case 2:16-cv-00619-JAD-VCF Document 22 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 2

1

and has had numerous substantive motions and responses; as well as other general appearances

2

and deadlines.

3

This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

4

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Response be extended an

5
6

additional fourteen (14) days up to and including Friday, April 14, 2017.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.

7

DATED this 30th day of March, 2017.

DATED this 30th day of March, 2017.

8

POTTER LAW OFFICES

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

9

By /s/ Cal. J. Potter, III, Esq.
CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff

By /s/ Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorney for Defendants

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ORDER

17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20

3/31/17
_______________
DATED

______________________________________
________________
__ _____ __ _
___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STATES DISTRIC
TATE
S R

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2