Tuuamalemalo v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Responses due by 4/21/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:16-cv-00619-JAD-VCF Document 23 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
POTTER LAW OFFICES
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ian Tuuamalemalo

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

IAN TUUAMALEMALO,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No.

2:16-cv-619-JAD-VCF

Plaintiff,
vs.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a Political Subdivision
of the STATE OF NEVADA; OFFICER
S. MPHILLIPS P#8903, individually;
OFFICER S. GREEN P#8918, individually;
SGT. TOM JENKINS P#4456; and THREE
NAMED UNKNOWN LAS VEGAS
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICERS, individually;

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
ECF No. 23

Defendants.

20
21

COMES NOW, the above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel

22

of record, and hereby agree, jointly stipulate that the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’

23

Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 21] filed on March 17, 2017, currently due April 7, 2017,

24

be extended an additional fourteen (14) days up to and including Friday, April 21, 2017.

25

The reason for this request is that Plaintiff’s counsel has numerous conflicting deadlines,

26

specifically four (4) Ninth Circuit Appellate Briefs, a Writ of Certiorari to the United States

27

Supreme Court, and numerous substantive motions and responses; as well as other general

28

appearances and deadlines.

Case 2:16-cv-00619-JAD-VCF Document 23 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 2

1

This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

2

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Response be extended an

3
4

additional fourteen (14) days up to and including Friday, April 21, 2017.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.

5

DATED this 30th day of March, 2017.

DATED this 30th day of March, 2017.

6

POTTER LAW OFFICES

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

7

By /s/ Cal. J. Potter, III, Esq.
CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff

By /s/ Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorney for Defendants

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

ORDER

15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18

3-31-17
_______________
DATED

______________________________________
________________
_ __ __ _ _
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STATES DISTRICT
A E
T I

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2