Tuuamalemalo v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Responses due by 4/21/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:16-cv-00619-JAD-VCF Document 23 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
POTTER LAW OFFICES
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: (702) 385-1954
Fax: (702) 385-9081
cpotter@potterlawoffices.com
cj@potterlawoffices.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ian Tuuamalemalo
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
IAN TUUAMALEMALO,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No.
2:16-cv-619-JAD-VCF
Plaintiff,
vs.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a Political Subdivision
of the STATE OF NEVADA; OFFICER
S. MPHILLIPS P#8903, individually;
OFFICER S. GREEN P#8918, individually;
SGT. TOM JENKINS P#4456; and THREE
NAMED UNKNOWN LAS VEGAS
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICERS, individually;
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
ECF No. 23
Defendants.
20
21
COMES NOW, the above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel
22
of record, and hereby agree, jointly stipulate that the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’
23
Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 21] filed on March 17, 2017, currently due April 7, 2017,
24
be extended an additional fourteen (14) days up to and including Friday, April 21, 2017.
25
The reason for this request is that Plaintiff’s counsel has numerous conflicting deadlines,
26
specifically four (4) Ninth Circuit Appellate Briefs, a Writ of Certiorari to the United States
27
Supreme Court, and numerous substantive motions and responses; as well as other general
28
appearances and deadlines.
Case 2:16-cv-00619-JAD-VCF Document 23 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 2
1
This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
2
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Response be extended an
3
4
additional fourteen (14) days up to and including Friday, April 21, 2017.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.
5
DATED this 30th day of March, 2017.
DATED this 30th day of March, 2017.
6
POTTER LAW OFFICES
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
7
By /s/ Cal. J. Potter, III, Esq.
CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1988
C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13225
1125 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By /s/ Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorney for Defendants
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
3-31-17
_______________
DATED
______________________________________
________________
_ __ __ _ _
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STATES DISTRICT
A E
T I
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?