Rowe v. Clark County School District et al
Filing
72
ORDER Granting 71 Motion to Remove Attorneys Craig R. Anderson and Brianna Smith from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL Document 71 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Marquis Aurbach Cuffing
Craig R. Anderson, l.sq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
E3rianna Smith, F;sq.
Nevada Bar No. 1 1795
10001 Park Run Drive
l,as Vegas, Nevada 89145
`Telephone:(702) 382-0711
f~acsirnile:(702) 382-5816
canderson@mac1 aw.cum
bsmith~cr~,maclaw.com
attorneys for Defendant I,as Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department
8
t1NITEll STATF,S DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
MIC~~AEL ROWF.
~~
12
z
w
w
O
°°
u
~ N
13
~n
x ;~M
~~
V Q~~
~_~..
14
15
~ ~za
~ ro
~°"~~
~ o>o
v~--~~
~~
~ M
16
Case No.:
Plaintiff,
I1
2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL
vs
CLARK COtJN"I'Y SCI-TOOL DIS"1~R1Cf1';
CLARK CO[1N'l~Y EDUCATION
EISSOCIATION; I,f1S VEGAS
M1-?TKOYOLI"IAN POI,IC~: DEPAR~I'MF,N"1~;
CLARK COUN"I~Y SCIIOOI, I~IS1'KIC"I'
POLICE DFPAR"['MF.~N"I'; UO~~:S I through X,
X, inclusive; and ROF; CORPORATIONS I
through X, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
N
Ot
18
h
19
2U
llEFENDANT' L.AS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT'S EX-PARTE
MOTION TO 12F,MOVF COIINSF.L FROM CM/ECF SERVICE LIST AND REQUEST
TO DISCONTINUE NOTICE OF PROCEEDINGS
2l
Defendant I,as Vegas Metropolitan Police Department("LVMPD"), by and through their
22
attorneys of record, hereby request removal of Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Brianna Smith, Esq.
23
from the LM/I;CF Service List and Discontinuation of Notice of Proceedings in the above-
24
captioned matter.
25
Defendant I,VMPD filed a Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice between
26
Plaintii~f Michael Rowe and LVMPU ~}?CF~ No. 63], and is no longer be associated with this
27
matter. Accordingly, the undersigned counsel requests that only Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and
28
Page 1 of 3
MAC:05166-917 2983604 1
~~
Case 2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL Document 71 Filed 01/12/17 Page 2 of 3
1
Brianna Smith, Esq. be removed from the CM/F,CF Service list in this matter, United States
2
District COLIl"t. Case No.: 2:16-cv-00661-.1CM-PAI.,.
3
Dated this ,12th day of.lanuary, 2017.
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
4
5
By: /s/ Brianna Smith
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
Brianna Smith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11795
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Defendant Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
z
w
w
O
U
,~
`°
~ N
W
x °~~
~ ~ `~
U ~~
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day
of January, 2017.
13
14
,.,
~ _~
15
~~zQ
~ ~; ~,.
~ a ~~
___________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
16
d o>o
~--~ ~-,
--~
~
17
o
Ot
18
►!
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2K
Page 2 of 3
MAC:05166-917 2983604 1
Case 2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL Document 71 Filed 01/12/17 Page 3 of 3
CER'TIFICA'TE OF SEKVICE
1
2
3
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing EX-PARTE MOTION TO
I REMOVF. COUNSF,I, FROM
CM/F,CF SERVICE
LIST
AND
REQUEST TO
4
llISCONTINUE NOTICE OF PROCEEDINGS with the Clerk of the Court for the United
5
States District Court by using the court's CM/F.,CF system on the 12th day of January, 2017.
I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and
6
7
K
that service will be accomplished by the CM/l?CF system.
~
I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered
9
lU
have dispatched it io a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the
11
~~
w
w
O
V
CM/1Cr users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or
following non-CM/t:CI~ participants:
12
13
n N
M
U ~o
°~~
~~~
Plaintiff Michael Rowe
2300 W. Silverado Ranch ~31vd., #1025
Las Vegas, Nevada 89183
In Proper Person
14
15
~~za
~y
r~ a
W
16
A~
~o>o
cn — ~~
~,
~
o
O~
18
►!
An employee of Marquis Aurbach Coffing
19
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of i
MAC:05166-917 2983604
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?