Rowe v. Clark County School District et al

Filing 72

ORDER Granting 71 Motion to Remove Attorneys Craig R. Anderson and Brianna Smith from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL Document 71 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Marquis Aurbach Cuffing Craig R. Anderson, l.sq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 E3rianna Smith, F;sq. Nevada Bar No. 1 1795 10001 Park Run Drive l,as Vegas, Nevada 89145 `Telephone:(702) 382-0711 f~acsirnile:(702) 382-5816 canderson@mac1 aw.cum bsmith~cr~,maclaw.com attorneys for Defendant I,as Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 8 t1NITEll STATF,S DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 MIC~~AEL ROWF. ~~ 12 z w w O °° u ~ N 13 ~n x ;~M ~~ V Q~~ ~_~.. 14 15 ~ ~za ~ ro ~°"~~ ~ o>o v~--~~ ~~ ~ M 16 Case No.: Plaintiff, I1 2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL vs CLARK COtJN"I'Y SCI-TOOL DIS"1~R1Cf1'; CLARK CO[1N'l~Y EDUCATION EISSOCIATION; I,f1S VEGAS M1-?TKOYOLI"IAN POI,IC~: DEPAR~I'MF,N"1~; CLARK COUN"I~Y SCIIOOI, I~IS1'KIC"I' POLICE DFPAR"['MF.~N"I'; UO~~:S I through X, X, inclusive; and ROF; CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, 17 Defendants. N Ot 18 h 19 2U llEFENDANT' L.AS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT'S EX-PARTE MOTION TO 12F,MOVF COIINSF.L FROM CM/ECF SERVICE LIST AND REQUEST TO DISCONTINUE NOTICE OF PROCEEDINGS 2l Defendant I,as Vegas Metropolitan Police Department("LVMPD"), by and through their 22 attorneys of record, hereby request removal of Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Brianna Smith, Esq. 23 from the LM/I;CF Service List and Discontinuation of Notice of Proceedings in the above- 24 captioned matter. 25 Defendant I,VMPD filed a Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice between 26 Plaintii~f Michael Rowe and LVMPU ~}?CF~ No. 63], and is no longer be associated with this 27 matter. Accordingly, the undersigned counsel requests that only Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and 28 Page 1 of 3 MAC:05166-917 2983604 1 ~~ Case 2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL Document 71 Filed 01/12/17 Page 2 of 3 1 Brianna Smith, Esq. be removed from the CM/F,CF Service list in this matter, United States 2 District COLIl"t. Case No.: 2:16-cv-00661-.1CM-PAI.,. 3 Dated this ,12th day of.lanuary, 2017. MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 4 5 By: /s/ Brianna Smith Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Brianna Smith, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11795 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 z w w O U ,~ `° ~ N W x °~~ ~ ~ `~ U ~~ IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of January, 2017. 13 14 ,., ~ _~ 15 ~~zQ ~ ~; ~,. ~ a ~~ ___________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 16 d o>o ~--~ ~-, --~ ~ 17 o Ot 18 ►! 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2K Page 2 of 3 MAC:05166-917 2983604 1 Case 2:16-cv-00661-JCM-PAL Document 71 Filed 01/12/17 Page 3 of 3 CER'TIFICA'TE OF SEKVICE 1 2 3 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing EX-PARTE MOTION TO I REMOVF. COUNSF,I, FROM CM/F,CF SERVICE LIST AND REQUEST TO 4 llISCONTINUE NOTICE OF PROCEEDINGS with the Clerk of the Court for the United 5 States District Court by using the court's CM/F.,CF system on the 12th day of January, 2017. I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and 6 7 K that service will be accomplished by the CM/l?CF system. ~ I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered 9 lU have dispatched it io a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the 11 ~~ w w O V CM/1Cr users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or following non-CM/t:CI~ participants: 12 13 n N M U ~o °~~ ~~~ Plaintiff Michael Rowe 2300 W. Silverado Ranch ~31vd., #1025 Las Vegas, Nevada 89183 In Proper Person 14 15 ~~za ~y r~ a W 16 A~ ~o>o cn — ~~ ~, ~ o O~ 18 ►! An employee of Marquis Aurbach Coffing 19 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of i MAC:05166-917 2983604

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?