The State of Nevada v. United States Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Filing
125
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 124 Defendants Darrell E Jackson, Thomas M. Strawn, and Andrew S. Levy's petition for permission to appeal shall be heard at the previously scheduled hearing on Wednesday, 10/11/2017 on a stacked calendar beginning a t 9:00 a.m. in the Thomas & Mack Moot Court Room at UNLV's Boyd School of Law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any response shall be filed by 10/6/2017. No replies. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
STATE OF NEVADA,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY, et al.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00665-APG-GWF
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND
HEARING SCHEDULE ON PETITION
TO APPEAL
(ECF No. 124)
Defendants.
9
Defendants Darrell E Jackson, Thomas M. Strawn, and Andrew S. Levy filed a petition
10
11
for permission to appeal. ECF No. 124. This petition will be heard at the hearing set for
12
Wednesday, October 11, 2017 on a stacked calendar beginning at 9:00 a.m. in the Thomas &
13
Mack Moot Court Room at UNLV’s Boyd School of Law. Any response to the petition shall be
14
filed by Friday, October 6, 2017. No reply will be necessary, as the motion will be heard at the
15
October 11th hearing.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Darrell E Jackson, Thomas M. Strawn,
16
17
and Andrew S. Levy’s petition for permission to appeal. (ECF No. 124) shall be heard at the
18
previously scheduled hearing on Wednesday, October 11, 2017 on a stacked calendar beginning
19
at 9:00 a.m. in the Thomas & Mack Moot Court Room at UNLV’s Boyd School of Law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any response shall be filed by October 6, 2017. No
20
21
22
replies.
DATED this 2nd day of October, 2017.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?