The State of Nevada v. United States Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Filing 125

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 124 Defendants Darrell E Jackson, Thomas M. Strawn, and Andrew S. Levy's petition for permission to appeal shall be heard at the previously scheduled hearing on Wednesday, 10/11/2017 on a stacked calendar beginning a t 9:00 a.m. in the Thomas & Mack Moot Court Room at UNLV's Boyd School of Law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any response shall be filed by 10/6/2017. No replies. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 STATE OF NEVADA, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 8 v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00665-APG-GWF ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON PETITION TO APPEAL (ECF No. 124) Defendants. 9 Defendants Darrell E Jackson, Thomas M. Strawn, and Andrew S. Levy filed a petition 10 11 for permission to appeal. ECF No. 124. This petition will be heard at the hearing set for 12 Wednesday, October 11, 2017 on a stacked calendar beginning at 9:00 a.m. in the Thomas & 13 Mack Moot Court Room at UNLV’s Boyd School of Law. Any response to the petition shall be 14 filed by Friday, October 6, 2017. No reply will be necessary, as the motion will be heard at the 15 October 11th hearing. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Darrell E Jackson, Thomas M. Strawn, 16 17 and Andrew S. Levy’s petition for permission to appeal. (ECF No. 124) shall be heard at the 18 previously scheduled hearing on Wednesday, October 11, 2017 on a stacked calendar beginning 19 at 9:00 a.m. in the Thomas & Mack Moot Court Room at UNLV’s Boyd School of Law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any response shall be filed by October 6, 2017. No 20 21 22 replies. DATED this 2nd day of October, 2017. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?