Banerjee et al v. Continental Incorporated, Inc., et al

Filing 19

ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation to Grant an Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to file Response to 10 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 5/16/2016. Replies due by 5/30/2016. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Case 2:16-cv-00669-JCM-VCF Document 17 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2

1 JEFFREY I. PITEGOFF, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 005458
2 RYAN S. PETERSEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10715
3 MORRIS, SULLIVAN, LEMKUL & PITEGOFF, LLP
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 170
4 Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
ADRISH BANERJEE, an individual, and
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00669-JCM-VCF
9 YAN HE, an individual,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
10
Plaintiffs,
TO GRANT AN EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE RESPONSE TO
11 vs.
MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 10]
12 CONTINENTAL INCORPORATED, INC.,
d/b/a CONTINENTAL ENTERPRISES, an
13 Indiana Corporation, LEAPERS, INC., a
Michigan Corporation, and DOES 1-10,
14 inclusive,
15

(First Request Via Stipulation for an Extension
of Time by Plaintiffs)

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiffs Adrish Banjeree and Yan He (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through the law

18 firm Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff, LLP, and Defendants, Continental Incorporated, Inc.
19 (“Continental”) and Leapers, Inc. (“Leapers”)(collectively, “Defendants”), by and through the law
20 firm Carbajal & McNutt LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
21

1. Whereas, on April 13, 2016, Defendants file a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule

22

of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6). (Docket No. 10)

23

2. Whereas, the current deadline for Plaintiffs to file a Response is May 2, 2016.1

24

3. Whereas, a hearing date has not been set on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

25
26
27

1

April 30, 2016 is a Saturday. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 6 the period continues to run until the end of the next
day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. As such, the Response date is May 2, 2016.

28
1

Case 2:16-cv-00669-JCM-VCF Document 17 Filed 04/29/16 Page 2 of 2

1

Wherefore, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a

2 Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6)
3
4

shall be extended to May 16, 2016.
Wherefore, the Parties further stipulate and agree that the deadline for Defendants to file a Reply

5
6

in Support of the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to May 30, 2016.

7 So stipulated April 29, 2016.

So stipulated April 29, 2016.

8 CARBAJAL & MCNUTT LLP

MORRIS, SULLIVAN,
PITEGOFF, LLP

LEMKUL

9
/s/ Ryan Petersen________________
JEFFREY I. PITEGOFF (SBN 5458)
RYAN S. PETERSEN (SBN 10715)
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

/s/ Matt Wolf________________
DANIEL R. MCNUTT (SBN 7815)
11 MATTHEW C. WOLF (SBN 10801)
625 South Eighth Street
12 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Defendants
13
10

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED

16
17
18
19

__________________________________
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
May 3, 2016
Dated: ____________

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

&