Bank of America, N.A. v. The Willows Homeowners' Association, et al

Filing 42

ORDER Denying 30 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs and Granting 32 Motion to Strike 30 . Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DENYING DEMAND FOR SECURITY COSTS AND GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE v. WILLOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., (ECF Nos. 30, 32) Defendants. 9 10 Case No. 2:16-cv-00678-APG-CWH Plaintiff/counterdefendant Bank of America, N.A. requests the court require defendant/counterclaimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC to post a cost bond pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes § 18.130(1). SFR moves to strike this request, arguing that § 18.130(1) does not apply because SFR is not a plaintiff and SFR is a Nevada limited liability company that resides in Nevada. Under § 18.130(1), “[w]hen a plaintiff in an action resides out of the State, or is a foreign corporation, security for the costs and charges which may be awarded against such plaintiff may be required by the defendant, by the filing and service on plaintiff of a written demand therefor within the time limited for answering the complaint.” The statute thus applies to out-of-state plaintiffs, of which SFR is neither. SFR is a defendant in this case. And, SFR is a Nevada limited liability company that resides in Nevada. See ECF Nos. 1 at 2 and 27 at 2 (alleging and admitting that SFR is a Nevada limited liability company); 49-1 (deposition testimony that SFR operates only in Nevada).1 The fact that SFR’s members may be citizens of other states for purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction under federal law does not change SFR’s residency or status as a Nevada limited liability company for purposes of the Nevada statute. 25 26 27 28 1 See also the Nevada Secretary of State website identifying SFR as a Nevada limited liability company with registered agent and officer addresses in Nevada. https://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=enkrPI2ZQlSNORkAAyF%252fAw%253d %253d&nt7=0 (last accessed on August 3, 2016). 1 2 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff/counterdefendant Bank of America, N.A.’s demand for security costs (ECF No. 30) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant/counterclaimant SFR Investments Pool 1, 4 LLC’s motion to strike (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED. 5 DATED this 3rd day of August, 2016. 6 7 8 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?