Kiessling v. Rader et al

Filing 42

ORDER. The Court STRIKES the document filed at Docket No. 41 and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 JAMES KIESSLING, 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 Plaintiff filed a deposition subpoena. Docket No. 41. Discovery-related documents are not 17 to be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No 18 such order has been entered by the Court in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the 19 document filed at Docket No. 41 and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents 20 on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so. 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 DET. RADER P#6099, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 21 ORDER (Docket No. 41) IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Case No. 2:16-cv-00690-GMN-NJK Dated: March 30, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?