Bank of America, N.A. v. Spanish Bay Homeowners Association et al

Filing 142

DEFAULT JUDGMENT - The Motion for Default Judgment against James Carlson (ECF No. 140 ) is granted. Carlson, any successors and assigns, have no right, title or interest in the Property and that SFR is the rightful title owner. This judgment does not adjudicate SFR's claims against, or the defenses of, any other party to this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/25/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DIANA S. EBRON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10580 E-mail: diana@kgelegal.com JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10593 E-mail: jackie@kgelegal.com CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 E-mail: chantel@kgelegal.com KIM GILBERT EBRON 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Telephone: (702) 485-3300 Facsimile: (702) 485-3301 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 (702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301 KIM GILBERT EBRON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89139 10 13 14 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, 17 18 19 20 21 JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST JAMES CARLSON Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No. 2:16-cv-00691-MMD-EJY vs. SPANISH BAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.; SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Defendants. ______________________________________ SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, 22 Counter/Cross Claimant, 23 vs. 24 25 26 27 28 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; and JAMES CARLSON, an individual, Counter/Cross Defendants. -1- JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST JAMES CARLSON 1 2 This matter came before the Court on SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) Motion for Judgment by Default against James Carlson (“Carlson” or “Cross-Defendant”). Having considered 3 the motion, including the declarations attached thereto, the Court makes the following findings of 4 fact and conclusions of law: 5 1. On June 13, 2016 SFR filed a Cross-Complaint [ECF No. 22] for quiet title and injunctive 6 relief against Carlson, relating to real property located at 5674 Snow Drop Street, Las Vegas, 7 Nevada 89113; Parcel No. 163-27-415-047 (“the Property”). 8 2. Carlson failed to answer the complaint within the 21-day time limit set forth in FRCP 12. 9 The Clerk of the Court appropriately entered a default against Carlson on March 7, 2019. 10 3. Carlson is not incompetent, an infant, or serving in the United States military. 4. SFR submitted credible evidence in support of its motion in the form of documents 12 obtained from the Official Records of the Clark County Recorder and declarations made under (702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301 KIM GILBERT EBRON 7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89139 11 13 penalty of perjury that demonstrate prima facie grounds sufficient to enter default judgment against 14 Carlson. 15 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to FRCP 55(b)(2), having considered the evidence and 16 made the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, and finding good cause, 17 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Carlson, any successors and 18 assigns, have no right, title or interest in the Property and that SFR is the rightful title owner. 19 … 20 21 … 22 23 … 24 25 … 26 27 … 28 -2- 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this judgment does not adjudicate SFR’s claims against, or the defenses of, any other party to this case. 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 Dated: May 25, 2021 7 8 9 10 12 (702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301 KIM GILBERT EBRON 7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89139 11 13 14 DATED this 10th day of May, 2021. Respectfully submitted by: KIM GILBERT EBRON /s/ Chantel M. Schimming CHANTEL SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 7625 Dean Martin Dr., Ste. 110 Las Vegas, NV 89139 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, L LC 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?