Bank of America, N.A. v. Spanish Bay Homeowners Association et al
Filing
142
DEFAULT JUDGMENT - The Motion for Default Judgment against James Carlson (ECF No. 140 ) is granted. Carlson, any successors and assigns, have no right, title or interest in the Property and that SFR is the rightful title owner. This judgment does not adjudicate SFR's claims against, or the defenses of, any other party to this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/25/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DIANA S. EBRON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
E-mail: diana@kgelegal.com
JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
E-mail: jackie@kgelegal.com
CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8886
E-mail: chantel@kgelegal.com
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Telephone: (702) 485-3300
Facsimile: (702) 485-3301
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89139
10
13
14
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
17
18
19
20
21
JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST
JAMES CARLSON
Plaintiff,
15
16
Case No. 2:16-cv-00691-MMD-EJY
vs.
SPANISH BAY HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; NEVADA ASSOCIATION
SERVICES, INC.; SFR INVESTMENTS
POOL 1, LLC,
Defendants.
______________________________________
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC,
22
Counter/Cross Claimant,
23
vs.
24
25
26
27
28
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; and
JAMES CARLSON, an individual,
Counter/Cross Defendants.
-1-
JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST JAMES CARLSON
1
2
This matter came before the Court on SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) Motion for
Judgment by Default against James Carlson (“Carlson” or “Cross-Defendant”). Having considered
3
the motion, including the declarations attached thereto, the Court makes the following findings of
4
fact and conclusions of law:
5
1.
On June 13, 2016 SFR filed a Cross-Complaint [ECF No. 22] for quiet title and injunctive
6
relief against Carlson, relating to real property located at 5674 Snow Drop Street, Las Vegas,
7
Nevada 89113; Parcel No. 163-27-415-047 (“the Property”).
8
2.
Carlson failed to answer the complaint within the 21-day time limit set forth in FRCP 12.
9
The Clerk of the Court appropriately entered a default against Carlson on March 7, 2019.
10
3.
Carlson is not incompetent, an infant, or serving in the United States military.
4.
SFR submitted credible evidence in support of its motion in the form of documents
12
obtained from the Official Records of the Clark County Recorder and declarations made under
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89139
11
13
penalty of perjury that demonstrate prima facie grounds sufficient to enter default judgment against
14
Carlson.
15
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to FRCP 55(b)(2), having considered the evidence and
16
made the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, and finding good cause,
17
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Carlson, any successors and
18
assigns, have no right, title or interest in the Property and that SFR is the rightful title owner.
19
…
20
21
…
22
23
…
24
25
…
26
27
…
28
-2-
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this judgment does not adjudicate SFR’s claims against,
or the defenses of, any other party to this case.
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
Dated: May 25, 2021
7
8
9
10
12
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89139
11
13
14
DATED this 10th day of May, 2021.
Respectfully submitted by:
KIM GILBERT EBRON
/s/ Chantel M. Schimming
CHANTEL SCHIMMING, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8886
7625 Dean Martin Dr., Ste. 110
Las Vegas, NV 89139
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, L LC
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?