Tagle v. Nouheim et al
Filing
31
ORDER that the 27 Motion for Review of Filings and 28 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing do not appear to relate to the underlying allegations in this case and are therefore Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
VICTOR TAGLE,
10
11
12
13
14
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
CLARK COUNTY, et al.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00709-GMN-NJK
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 27, 28)
15
The undersigned magistrate judge has issued a report and recommendation in this case, and Plaintiff
16
has filed an objection. Docket Nos. 8, 10. The assigned district judge will resolve that objection in the
17
ordinary course. In the interim, however, Plaintiff has bombarded the Court with filings that appear to have
18
nothing to do with this case. See, e.g., Docket No. 19 (response to motion for summary judgment).
19
Plaintiff does so by simply listing multiple case numbers on his filings. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to
20
file in this case only documents that actually relate to this case. Plaintiff is further ORDERED that he may
21
not submit documents for filing in this case that contain numerous case numbers. Moving forward, the
22
Court will strike documents filed in this case containing more than one case number.
23
24
The motions filed by Plaintiff at Docket Nos. 27 and 28 do not appear to relate to the underlying
allegations in this case, and are therefore DENIED.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: May 4, 2016
27
28
________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?