Bank of America, N.A., v. Desert Pine Villas Homeowners Association et al
Filing
54
ORDER Granting 51 Stipulation To Extend Time To file Response To Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/25/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
Case 2:16-cv-00725-JCM-NJK Document 53 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
ROBERT ENGLISH. ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 003504
6750 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 310
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Phone: (702) 733-4989, Ext. 51575
Fax: (877) 888-1396
renglish@amfam.com
Attorney for Desert Pine Villas Homeowners Association
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP;
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF NO.41]
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
vs.
DESERT PINE VILLAS HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; SFR INVESTMENTS
POOL 1, LLC; AND ALESSI & KOENIG,
LLC;
(First Request)
Defendants.
_____________________________________
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC.
20
Counter/Cross Claimant,
21
22
vs.
23
24
25
26
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO BANA HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; and
JANET ROBITAILLE, an individual,
27
28
Case No. 2:16-cv-00725-JCM-NJK
Counter/ Cross Defendants.
1
Case 2:16-cv-00725-JCM-NJK Document 53 Filed 10/24/16 Page 2 of 3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
1
2
SUCCESSOR
3
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP (the “Bank”) and Defendants DESERT
4
BY
MERGER
TO
BANA
HOME
LOANS
SERVICING,
LP
FKA
PINE VILLA HOMEOWNERS ASSCOATION (“Desert Pine”) and ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC
5
(“A&K”), by and through their undersigned counsel, to extend the deadline for Desert Pine and
6
7
A&K to file their Responses to the Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 41], filed on
8
September 27, 2016, a response which is currently due on October 21, 2016, to 60 days after an
9
order is entered on the Bank’s Emergency Motion for Protection from its 30(b)(6) Deposition and
10
Motion for Sanctions [ECF Nos. 46, 47]. This is intended to allow sensible scheduling of the
11
deposition once the motion is decided, with a reasonable opportunity for all defendants to
12
incorporate deposition testimony in their responses to the motion.
13
The parties are still engaging in discovery. Rather than engage in what may become
14
15
unnecessary motion practice at the time and expense of the parties and judicial resources, this
16
request is being made to allow time for resolution of said discovery.
17
///
18
///
19
20
///
///
21
///
22
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
2
Case 2:16-cv-00725-JCM-NJK Document 53 Filed 10/24/16 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
This is Desert Pine’s and A&K’s first request for an extension and is not intended to
cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
DATED this 20th day of October, 2016.
4
AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE
AKERMAN, LLP
//s// Robert L. English
Robert L. English, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 3504
6750 Via Austi Parkway, Ste. 310
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Attorney for Desert Pine Villas
Homeowners Association
//s// Tenesa S. Scaturro
Tenesa S. Scaturro, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12488
Melanie D. Morgan, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8215
1160 Town Center Drive Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A.,
Successor by Merger to BANA Home Loans
Servicing, LP fka Countrywide Home Loans
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ALESSI & KOENING, LLC
13
14
15
16
//s// Steven T. Loizzi
Steven T. Loizzi, Esq.
Nevada Bar No 10920
9500 W. Flamingo Road, Ste. 205
Las Vegas, NV 89147
Attorneys for Alessi & Koenig, LLC
17
18
ORDER
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
October 25, 2016.
Dated this ____ of October, 2016.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Submitted by:
//s// Robert L. English
Robert L. English, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 3504
6760 Via Austi Parkway, Ste. 310
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Attorney for Desert Pine Villas Homeowners Association
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?