Bank of America, N.A., v. Desert Pine Villas Homeowners Association et al
ORDER Denying 42 Joint Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
DESERT PINE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, )
Case No. 2:16-cv-00725-JCM-NJK
(Docket No. 42)
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ joint motion to stay, filed on an emergency basis.
Docket No. 42. Plaintiff filed a response, and Defendant SFR filed a reply. Docket Nos. 44, 45.
Plaintiff and Defendant SFR also filed supplemental briefing in accordance with the Court’s
November 14, 2016 order. Docket Nos. 57, 58, 60. The Court finds this motion properly resolved
without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1.
Defendants’ joint motion to stay was originally filed based on the pendency of the Ninth
Circuit’s mandate regarding a petition to rehear en banc Bourne Valley Court Tr. v. Wells Fargo
Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 832 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2016). See, e.g., Docket No. 42 at 3 (“[T]he Ninth
Circuit’s ultimate resolution of this issue may have a dispositive effect upon this litigation.”) The
Ninth Circuit has now denied the petition for rehearing en banc and has issued its mandate. Thus,
Bourne Valley is now controlling law in this Circuit.
Accordingly, Defendants’ joint motion to stay, Docket No. 42, is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 12, 2017
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?