Sexton et al v. County of Clark Nevada et al

Filing 410

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: the Nevada Department of Corrections must showcause within fourteen (14) days of this order why it has failed to comply with the 318 Court's order. If there is no response to this order, the Court will impose sanctions fo r the failureto respond or comply. Further, the Court Denies 392 Motion for Emergency Hearing and 397 Motion for Hearing, both without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/3/2020.; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2020. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF with hard copy mailed to High Desert State Prison - DRS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

TONEY ANTHONEY WHITE,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10

Case No. 2:16-cv-00734-RFB-VCF
ORDER

v.
COUNTY OF CLARK NEVADA, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13

I.

14

On February 27, 2020, the Court stated it would order the Nevada Department of

15

Corrections (“NDOC”) to provide Plaintiff medical discs that were confiscated upon Plaintiff’s

16

transfer to High Desert State Prison on March 29, 2019, and which Plaintiff states are necessary

17

in order for him to litigate this case. ECF No. 379. The Court issued the order on March 6, 2020.

18

ECF No. 384. In particular, the Court directed NDOC to file a Notice of Compliance within one

19

week of date of the order. Id.

INTRODUCTION

20

On March 18, 2020, the Court noted NDOC had failed to comply with this order and

21

ordered NDOC to file a Notice of Compliance by March 20, 2020, or the Court would issue a show

22

cause order.

23

NDOC has again failed to comply with the Court’s order.

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Nevada Department of Corrections must show

2

cause within fourteen (14) days of this order why it has failed to comply with the Court’s order

3

(ECF No. 318). If there is no response to this order, the Court will impose sanctions for the failure

4

to respond or comply.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency Hearing on Missing

6

Evidentiary Discs (ECF No. 392) and Motion for Hearing re: Production of Property (ECF No.

7

397) are DENIED without prejudice. The Court will determine the necessity of a hearing based

8

upon NDOC’s response to this order.

9
10

DATED April 3, 2020.

11

__________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-