Bank of America, N.A. v. Village of Avellino Homeowners Association et al
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 15 Motion for Order Authorizing Service of Summons and Complaint Upon Defendants Daniel Fields and Via Vinci Revocable Trust by Publication and Order Enlarging Time for Service of Process. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/1/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:16-cv-00748-JCM-PAL Document 15-4 Filed 06/28/16 Page 2 of 3
1
6
DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
ALLISON R. SCHMIDT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10743
AKERMANLLP
AKERMAN LLP
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Telephone: (702) 634-5000
Telephone: (702)
Facsimile. (702) 380-8572
Facsimile: (702)
Email: darren.brenner@akerman.com
darren.brenner@akerman.com
Email: allison.schmidt@akerman.com
allison.schmidt@akerman.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
10
AKERMAN LLP
C
C+1
C+1
0g
11
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00748-JCM-PAL
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
VILLAGE OF AVELLINO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; DANIEL FIELDS; VIA VINCI
REVOCABLE TRUST; ABSOLUTE
COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC,
15
16
Defendants.
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER
AUTHORIZING SERVICE OF SUMMONS
AND COMPLAINT UPON DEFENDANTS
DANIEL FIELDS AND VIA VINCI
REVOCABLE TRUST BY PUBLICATION
AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR
SERVICE OF PROCESS
18
The matter is before the court on plaintiff Bank of America's motion for order authorizing
The matter before the court on plaintiff Bank of America's motion for order authorizing
19
service of summons and complaint upon defendants Daniel Fields (Fields) and Via Vinci Revocable
20
21
Trust (Via Vinci) by publication and order enlarging time for service of process. [(ECF No. __].
publication and order enlarging time for service of process. [(ECF No. _].
Upon review of the pleadings, declarations and evidence presented, it appears to the satisfaction of
22
the court, and the court finds, that:
23
24
25
26
27
(1)
(1) Plaintiff BANA has a valid cause of action against defendants Fields and Via Vinci;
(2)
(2) Defendants Fields and Via Vinci are necessary and proper parties;
(3)
(3) NRCP 4(e) provides for publication of the summons and complaint under the circumstances;
(4)
(4) The Nevada Legal News is a newspaper of general circulation published in Clark County, State
of Nevada;
(5)
diligently attempted to serve defendants Fields and Via Vinci within the State
(5) BANA has diligently attempted to serve defendants Fields and Via Vinci within the State of
Nevada;
28
{38583401;1}
1
1
Case 2:16-cv-00748-JCM-PAL Document 15-4 Filed 06/28/16 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
There
good cause to extend the time for service of the summons and complaint upon
(6) There is good cause to extend the time for service of the summons and complaint upon
defendants Fields and Via Vinci for an additional sixty (60) days.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the summons and complaint in this suit be served on defendants
ORDERED
complaint
Fields and Via Vinci herein by publication thereof in the above-named newspaper and that the publication
4
be made for a period of four (4) weeks and at least once per week;
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for service of the summons and complaint upon
service of the summons and complaint upon
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time
defendants Fields and Via Vinci extended
an additional sixty (60) days through and including
defendants Fields and Via Vinci is extended for an additional sixty (60) days through and including
September __,2016.
September2 2016.
,
1,
July
DATED: _________ ___, 2016
AKERMAN LLP
1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
10
____________________________________
UNITED A. LEEN DISTRICT JUDGE
PEGGY STATES
11
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{38583401;1}
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?