Bank of America, N.A. v. Monte Bello Homeowners Association, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER Granting 60 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 50 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8386 KAREN A. WHELAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10466 AKERMAN LLP 1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Telephone: (702) 634-5000 Facsimile: (702) 380-8572 Email: darren.brenner@akerman.com Email: karen.whelan@akerman.com Attorneys for plaintiff and counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA AKERMAN LLP 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 11 12 13 14 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 vs. MONTE BELLO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; ATC ASSESSMENT COLLECTION GROUP, LLC; and EAGLE INVESTORS, 19 Defendants. 20 EAGLE INVESTORS, a Nevada corporation, 21 Counterclaimant, 22 vs. 23 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, a national bank, DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, INCLUSIVE, 24 25 26 Counter-Defendants. 27 28 1 43798372;1 Case No.: 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO (1) OPPOSE EAGLE INVESTORS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 52]; AND (2) REPLY TO EAGLE INVESTORS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 54] SECOND REQUEST Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 2 of 4 1 Plaintiff and counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home 2 Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (BANA) and defendant Eagle 3 Investors respectfully submit the following stipulation to allow BANA (1) seven additional days to 4 oppose Eagle Investors' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 52; and (2) seven additional days 5 to reply to Eagle Investors' opposition to BANA's motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 6 54. Investors filed its own motion for summary judgment on December 6, 2017 and opposed BANA's 9 motion for partial summary judgment on December 11, 2017. (ECF Nos. 52, 24.) BANA's original 10 deadline to reply to Eagle Investors' opposition was December 26, 2017. See L.R. 7-2. BANA's 11 AKERMAN LLP BANA moved for partial summary judgment on November 20, 2017. (ECF No. 50.) Eagle 8 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 7 original deadline to oppose Eagle Investors' motion for summary judgment was December 27, 2017. 12 See id. The parties stipulated to extending BANA's opposition and reply deadlines to January 16, 13 2018 on December 22, 2017. (ECF No. 57.) The Court approved the stipulation on December 27, 14 2017. (ECF No. 59.) 15 BANA and Eagle Investors stipulate to extend BANA's reply deadline by seven additional 16 days and BANA's opposition deadline by seven additional days, to January 23, 2018, to allow 17 BANA additional time to prepare its briefing. 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 43798372;1 Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 3 of 4 1 This is BANA's second request to extend its deadline to reply to Eagle Investors' opposition 2 and oppose Eagles Investors' summary judgment motion. BANA does not make its requests to cause 3 delay or prejudice to any party. 4 Dated this 10th day of January, 2018. Dated this 11th day of January, 2018. 5 AKERMAN LLP AYON LAW, PLLC /s/ Karen A. Whelan, Esq. DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8386 KAREN A. WHELAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10466 1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 /s/ Luis A. Ayon, Esq. LUIS A. AYON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9752 VANESSA S. GOULET, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13688 8716 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Suite 115 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Attorneys for plaintiff and counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP Attorneys for defendant Eagle Investors 6 7 8 9 10 AKERMAN LLP 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 11 12 13 ORDER 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 23 Dated this ___day of January, 2018. 17 Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 43798372;1 Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 4 of 4 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify on the 12th day of January, 2018, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, I 3 filed and served true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 4 EXTEND TIME TO (1) OPPOSE EAGLE INVESTORS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY 5 JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 52]; AND (2) REPLY TO EAGLE INVESTORS' OPPOSITION TO 6 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 54] via CM/ECF on the 7 following: 8 10 Sean L. Anderson, Esq. T. Chase Pittsenbarger, Esq. LEACH JOHNSON SONG & GRUCHOW 8945 W. Russell Road, Suite #330 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 11 Attorneys for Monte Bello Homeowners Association, Inc. 12 14 Luis A. Ayon, Esq. AYON LAW, PLLC 9205 West Russell Road Building 3, Suite 240 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 15 Attorneys for Eagle Investors 16 Christopher A. Yergensen, Esq. NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. 6224 W. Desert Inn Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 AKERMAN LLP 1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 9 13 17 18 19 Attorney for ATC Assessment Group, LLC 20 21 /s/ Nick Mangels Nick Mangels, an employee of Akerman LLP 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 43798372;1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?