Bank of America, N.A. v. Monte Bello Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
Filing
64
ORDER Granting 60 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 50 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
KAREN A. WHELAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10466
AKERMAN LLP
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Telephone: (702) 634-5000
Facsimile: (702) 380-8572
Email: darren.brenner@akerman.com
Email: karen.whelan@akerman.com
Attorneys for plaintiff and counter-defendant
Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger
to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
AKERMAN LLP
1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
11
12
13
14
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING LP,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
vs.
MONTE BELLO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.; ATC ASSESSMENT
COLLECTION GROUP, LLC; and EAGLE
INVESTORS,
19
Defendants.
20
EAGLE INVESTORS, a Nevada corporation,
21
Counterclaimant,
22
vs.
23
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING, a national bank,
DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X; and ROE
CORPORATIONS I-X, INCLUSIVE,
24
25
26
Counter-Defendants.
27
28
1
43798372;1
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME TO (1) OPPOSE EAGLE
INVESTORS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 52]; AND (2)
REPLY TO EAGLE INVESTORS'
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF
NO. 54]
SECOND REQUEST
Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 2 of 4
1
Plaintiff and counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home
2
Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (BANA) and defendant Eagle
3
Investors respectfully submit the following stipulation to allow BANA (1) seven additional days to
4
oppose Eagle Investors' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 52; and (2) seven additional days
5
to reply to Eagle Investors' opposition to BANA's motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No.
6
54.
Investors filed its own motion for summary judgment on December 6, 2017 and opposed BANA's
9
motion for partial summary judgment on December 11, 2017. (ECF Nos. 52, 24.) BANA's original
10
deadline to reply to Eagle Investors' opposition was December 26, 2017. See L.R. 7-2. BANA's
11
AKERMAN LLP
BANA moved for partial summary judgment on November 20, 2017. (ECF No. 50.) Eagle
8
1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
7
original deadline to oppose Eagle Investors' motion for summary judgment was December 27, 2017.
12
See id. The parties stipulated to extending BANA's opposition and reply deadlines to January 16,
13
2018 on December 22, 2017. (ECF No. 57.) The Court approved the stipulation on December 27,
14
2017. (ECF No. 59.)
15
BANA and Eagle Investors stipulate to extend BANA's reply deadline by seven additional
16
days and BANA's opposition deadline by seven additional days, to January 23, 2018, to allow
17
BANA additional time to prepare its briefing.
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
43798372;1
Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 3 of 4
1
This is BANA's second request to extend its deadline to reply to Eagle Investors' opposition
2
and oppose Eagles Investors' summary judgment motion. BANA does not make its requests to cause
3
delay or prejudice to any party.
4
Dated this 10th day of January, 2018.
Dated this 11th day of January, 2018.
5
AKERMAN LLP
AYON LAW, PLLC
/s/ Karen A. Whelan, Esq.
DARREN T. BRENNER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
KAREN A. WHELAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10466
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
/s/ Luis A. Ayon, Esq.
LUIS A. AYON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9752
VANESSA S. GOULET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13688
8716 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Suite 115
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Attorneys for plaintiff and counter-defendant
Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
Attorneys for defendant Eagle Investors
6
7
8
9
10
AKERMAN LLP
1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
11
12
13
ORDER
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
23
Dated this ___day of January, 2018.
17
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
43798372;1
Case 2:16-cv-00794-GMN-CWH Document 60 Filed 01/12/18 Page 4 of 4
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I certify on the 12th day of January, 2018, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, I
3
filed and served true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
4
EXTEND TIME TO (1) OPPOSE EAGLE INVESTORS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY
5
JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 52]; AND (2) REPLY TO EAGLE INVESTORS' OPPOSITION TO
6
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 54] via CM/ECF on the
7
following:
8
10
Sean L. Anderson, Esq.
T. Chase Pittsenbarger, Esq.
LEACH JOHNSON SONG & GRUCHOW
8945 W. Russell Road, Suite #330
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
11
Attorneys for Monte Bello Homeowners Association, Inc.
12
14
Luis A. Ayon, Esq.
AYON LAW, PLLC
9205 West Russell Road
Building 3, Suite 240
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
15
Attorneys for Eagle Investors
16
Christopher A. Yergensen, Esq.
NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.
6224 W. Desert Inn Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
AKERMAN LLP
1635 VILLAGE CENTER CIRCLE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89134
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
9
13
17
18
19
Attorney for ATC Assessment Group, LLC
20
21
/s/ Nick Mangels
Nick Mangels, an employee of Akerman LLP
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
43798372;1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?