CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. FanDuel, Inc.

Filing 62

ORDER granting ECF No. 59 Stipulation : Replies to Motions to Dismiss, Stay, Sever (ECF Nos. 44 , 45 , 46 ) due by 8/22/2016. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC

10
11

W. WEST ALLEN
Nevada Bar. No. 5566
[e-mail]
HOWARD & HOWARD PLLC
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
ERISE IP, P.A.
Eric A. Buresh (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Megan J. Redmond (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Carrie A. Bader (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Clifford T. Brazil (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
6201 College Blvd., Suite 300
Overland Park, KS 66211
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12

Attorneys for Defendant FanDuel, Inc.
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
16
17
18

CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED, and
INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC,

Case No. 2:16-cv-00801-RCJ-VCF

19

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR FANDUEL, INC.
TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS
MOTIONS TO DISMISS, STAY, AND
SEVER

Plaintiffs,
20
21

vs.
FANDUEL, INC.,

22

Defendants.
23

(FIRST REQUEST)

24
25

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendant FanDuel, Inc. (“FanDuel”) and

26

Plaintiffs CG Technology Development, LLC, (“CG Tech”), Interactive Games Limited (“IG

27

Limited”) and Interactive Games LLC (“IG Games”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), by and

28

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1 of 3
4824-2213-8161, v. 1

1.

1

Defendant filed its Motions to Dismiss, Stay and Sever (ECF Nos. 44, 45, and

2

46) on July 14, 2016. The Plaintiffs filed Oppositions (ECF Nos. 51, 52, 55) to Defendant’s

3

Motions to Dismiss, Stay, and Sever (ECF Nos. 44, 45, and 46) on August 8, 2016.

4
5
6

2.

August 18, 2016. The parties respectfully request that these deadlines be extended up to and
including August 22, 2016.

7
8

The current deadline for Defendant to file Replies to those Oppositions is

3.

FanDuel has requested this extension because FanDuel needs additional time

to prepare three substantive Replies and to address the arguments made in the Plaintiffs’

9

Oppositions.
10

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC

THEREFORE, Plaintiffs CG Technology Development, LLC, Interactive Games
11

Limited, and Interactive Games LLC and Defendant FanDuel, Inc., hereby stipulate and agree
12
13
14

///

15
16

///

17
18

///

19
20

///

21
22

///

23
24

///

25
26

///

27
28

///
2 of 3
4824-2213-8161, v. 1

1
2

that FanDuel’s time to file Replies to Plaintiffs’ Oppositions shall be extended to and include

3

Monday, August 22, 2016.

4
5

DATED this 9th day of August 2016.

6

HOWARD & HOWARD PLLC

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

By: /s/ W. West Allen
W. WEST ALLEN
Nevada Bar No. 5566
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 1000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

By: /s/ Molly M. Rezac
MOLLY M. REZAC
Nevada Bar No. 7435
ERICA J. CHEE
Nevada Bar No. 12238
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

ERISE IP, P.A
Eric A. Buresh
Megan J. Redmond
Carrie A. Bader
Clifford T. Brazil
6201 College Blvd.
Suite 300
Overland Park, KS 66211

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
FARABOW, GARRETT &
DUNNER, LLP
Robert F. Shaffer
James R. Barney
Anthony D. Del Monaco
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 2001-4413

Attorneys for Defendant, FanDuel, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs CG Technology
Development, LLC, Interactive Games
Limited, and Interactive Games LLC

7
8
9

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
25

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26

DATED: __________________________
August 16, 2016

27
28

25768404.1

3 of 3
4824-2213-8161, v. 1