Los Cabos 1 v. Ross

Filing 3

ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Adopting 2 Report and Recommendation. The defendant's request for removal is Denied. FURTHER ORDERED that this case is Remanded to North Las Vegas Justice Court. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: NLV State Court w/Docket Sheet - JM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
LOS CABOS 1,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4
5
6

Plaintiff,
vs.
CRYSTAL ROSS,

7
Defendant.

8

Case No.: 2:16-cv-0817-GMN-GWF
ORDER

9
10

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States

11

Magistrate Judge George W. Foley, Jr., (ECF No. 2), which states that this case should be

12

remanded to North Las Vegas Justice Court.

13

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a

14

United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);

15

D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo

16

determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,

17

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

18

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is

19

not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an

20

objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized

21

that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

22

where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

23

1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

24

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.

25

Accordingly,

Page 1 of 2

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 2), is
ADOPTED in full.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s request for removal is DENIED.

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to North Las Vegas

5
6

Justice Court.
The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

7
8

25
DATED this ___ day of January, 2017.

9
10
11

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2