Bank of America, N.A. v. Sonrisa Homeowners Association et al
Filing
128
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 114 the parties' notice of corrected image/document regarding the refiled stipulation to amend complaint to reassert a breach of NRS 116.3116 and wrongful foreclosure claims be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 104 the parties' first stipulation to amend complaint to reassert a breach of NRS 116.3116 and wrongful foreclosure claims be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at 109 the parties' refiled stipulation to amend complaint to reassert a breach of NRS 116.3116 and wrongful foreclosure claims be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 105 the parties first stipulation and order for amended joint discovery plan be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 107 the parties' first stipulation and order for amended joint discovery plan be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
11
Case No. 2:16-CV-848 JCM (GWF)
ORDER
v.
SONRISA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
et al.,
Defendant(s).
12
13
Presently before the court is the matter of Bank of America, N.A. v. Sonrisa Homeowners
14
15
Association, et al., case no. 2:16-cv-00848-JCM-GWF.
On October 6, 2017, the parties filed (1) a stipulation and order to lift stay (ECF No. 103);
16
17
18
19
(2) a stipulation to amend complaint to reassert breach of NRS 116.3116 and wrongful foreclosure
claims having completed NRED mediation (ECF No. 104); and (3) a stipulation and order for
amended joint discovery plan (ECF No. 105).
On October 10, 2017, the court instructed the parties to correct the stipulation to amend
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
complaint (ECF No. 104) and to refile for failure to comply with Local Rule IC 2-2(b). (ECF No.
106).
On October 12, 2017, the parties filed: (1) a second stipulation and order to lift stay (ECF
No. 107); (2) a second stipulation and order for amended joint discovery plan (ECF No. 108); and
(3) refiled a stipulation and order to amend complaint to reassert a breach of NRS 116.3116 and
wrongful foreclosure claims (ECF No. 109).
On October 13, 2017, Magistrate Judge Foley granted the parties’ stipulation and order to
lift stay (ECF No. 103). (ECF No. 110). Also on October 13, 2017, Magistrate Judge Foley
1
granted the parties’ second stipulation and order for amended joint discovery plan (ECF No. 108).
2
(ECF No. 111).
3
On October 16, 2017, the court again instructed the parties to correct the stipulation to
4
amend complaint (ECF No. 109) and to refile for failure to comply with Local Rule 15-1(a). (ECF
5
No. 112).
6
On December 11, 2017, in compliance with the court’s request, the parties filed a notice of
7
corrected image/document as to the refiled stipulation and order to amend complaint (ECF No.
8
109). (ECF No. 114).
9
Accordingly,
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the parties’ notice of
11
corrected image/document regarding the refiled stipulation to amend complaint to reassert a breach
12
of NRS 116.3116 and wrongful foreclosure claims (ECF No. 114) be, and the same hereby is,
13
GRANTED.
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ first stipulation to amend complaint to
15
reassert a breach of NRS 116.3116 and wrongful foreclosure claims (ECF No. 104) be, and the
16
same hereby is, DENIED.
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ refiled stipulation to amend complaint to
18
reassert a breach of NRS 116.3116 and wrongful foreclosure claims (ECF No. 109) be, and the
19
same hereby is, DENIED.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ first stipulation and order for amended joint
discovery plan (ECF No. 105) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ first stipulation and order for amended joint
discovery plan (ECF No. 107) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot.
DATED July 13, 2018.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?