CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. 888 Holdings PLC

Filing 216

ORDER granting ECF No. 213 Stipulation. Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to File a Motion for Attorneys Fee (ECF No. 212 ) denied as moot. Each Party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this action. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/29/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

10
11
12
200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

9

Molly M. Rezac
Nevada Bar No. 7435
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]
Robert F. Shaffer (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
James R. Barney (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Anthony D. Del Monaco (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4413
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs CG Technology Development, LLC;
Interactive Games Limited; and Interactive Games LLC

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

14
15
16

CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED, and
INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC,

17

Plaintiffs,

18

vs.

19

888 HOLDINGS, PLC,

20

Defendant.

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00856-RCJ-EJY
Member Case:
2:16-cv-00871-RCJ-EJY
ORDER TO DENY MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY’S FEES AS MOOT,
RESOLVE ALL MATTERS AND CLOSE
THE CASE

21
22
23

Plaintiffs CG Technology Development, LLC, Interactive Games Limited and Interactive

24

Games LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant 888 Holdings, PLC (the “Defendant”, and

25

collectively with the Plaintiffs, the “Parties” and each a “Party”) hereby stipulate as follows:

26

1.

The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the matter entitled CG

27

Technology Development, LLC, et al. v. 888 Holdings, PLC, Case No. 2:16-cv-00856-RCJ-EYJ

28

(“Action”) and over the Parties in this Action;

1

2.

The Court entered final Judgment in this Action on March 1, 2022 (ECF No. 210);

2

3.

Defendant filed a Motion to Extend Time (First Request) to File a Motion for

3
4

Attorney’s Fee on March 10, 2022 (ECF No. 212);
4.

The Parties have resolved this matter and the Parties agree that Plaintiffs will not

5

file any post-trial motion or appeal from the Court’s Judgment or any other appeal in this Action

6

and Defendants will not file a motion for attorneys’ fees or any other post-trial motion;

7
8

Defendant’s Motion to Extend Time to File a Motion for Attorney’s Fee (First

Request) shall be denied as moot;
6.

Each Party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this action.

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11

200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

9

5.

DATED this 14th day of March, 2022.

12 By: /s/ William M. Gantz
William M. Gantz (pro hac vice)
13
DUANE MORRIS LLP
100 High Street, Suite 2400
14
Boston, MA 02110
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Laureen P. Frister
Nevada Bar No. 13217
LEWIS BRISBOIS BRISGAARD & SMITH, LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Ste. 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118

Robert F. Shaffer (pro hac vice)
James R. Barney (pro hac vice)
Anthony D. Del Monaco (pro hac vice)
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4413

Tyler R. Marandola (pro hac vice)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
30 S. 17th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Attorneys for Plaintiffs CG Technology
Development, LLC, Interactive Games
Limited, and Interactive Games LLC

Attorneys for Defendant 888 Holdings, PLC

23
24

By: /s/ Molly M. Rezac
Molly M. Rezac
Nevada Bar No. 7435
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, Nevada 89501

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

_________________________________
US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26

__________________________________
DATED March 29, 2022

27
28
2