CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. 888 Holdings PLC
Filing
89
ORDER granting 84 Motion to Seal 82 Redacted Motion to Compel, Exhibits 3 and 6. The instant 84 motion was filed in case no. 2:16-cv-801-RCJ-VCF on 7/27/17. To date, no opposition has been filed and the time to file an opposition has passed the Bwin's Motion to Seal 84 is GRANTED. See PDF for specifics. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BLG)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
6
CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, et
al.,
7
8
9
Plaintiffs,
vs.
FANDUEL, INC., et al.,
Lead case no. 2:16-cv-00856-RCJ-VCF
Consol. with case nos. 2:16-cv-00858-RCJ-VCF
and 2:16-00871-RCJ-VCF
ORDER
Defendants.
10
11
Before the Court is Bwin’s Motion to Seal (ECF No. 84). This motion was originally filed on July
12
27, 2017 in case no. 2:16-cv-00801-RCJ-VCF. (ECF No. 218). On July 27, 2017, Judge Jones granted
13
the motions to transfer for improper venue and case no. 2:16-cv-00801-RCJ-VCF was transferred to the
14
District of Delaware. (ECF No. 219). All remaining cases were consolidated into case no. 2:16-cv-0085615
RCJ-VCF. On August 9, 2017, the undersigned held a status hearing and the instant pending motion in
16
2:16-cv-00801-RCJ-VCF was transferred to lead case 2:16-cv-00856-RCJ-VCF. (ECF No. 72).
17
Under Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response
18
to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, constitutes a
19
consent to the granting of the motion. Here, the instant motion was filed in case no. 2:16-cv-00801-RCJ20
VCF on July 27, 2017. To date, no opposition has been filed and the time to file an opposition has passed.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bwin’s Motion to Seal (ECF No. 84) is GRANTED.
23
DATED this 22nd day of August, 2017.
24
25
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?