US Bank National Association v. BDJ Intestments, LLC, et al.
Filing
51
ORDER Granting 50 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Dana Jonathon Nitz and Kristin A. OQuinn are substituted in place of Thomas Beckom and Kristin A Schuler-Hintz for plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
8
10
Plaintiff,
v.
9
Case No. 2:16-cv-00866-GMN-PAL
ORDER
BDJ INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al.
(Subst Atty – ECF No. 50)
Defendants.
11
12
This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 50). Dana
13
Jonathon Nitz and Kristine A. O’Quinn of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP seek leave to be substituted
14
in the place and stead of Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz and Thomas Beckom of McCarthy & Holthus,
15
LLP for Plaintiff US Bank National Association. LR IA 11-6(c) provides that the signature of an
16
attorney to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial
17
proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order.” LR IA 11-6(d) also
18
provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial
19
proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.”
20
administratively stayed.
This case is currently
21
Having reviewed and considered the matter,
22
IT IS ORDERED:
23
1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF Nos. 50) is GRANTED.
24
2. Dana Jonathon Nitz and Kristin A. O’Quinn of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP are
25
substituted in the place of Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz and Thomas Beckom of McCarthy
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
& Holthus, for plaintiff US Bank National Association subject to the provisions of LR IA
2
11-6(c) and (d).
3
Dated this 21st day of September, 2017.
4
5
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?