US Bank National Association v. BDJ Intestments, LLC, et al.

Filing 51

ORDER Granting 50 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Dana Jonathon Nitz and Kristin A. OQuinn are substituted in place of Thomas Beckom and Kristin A Schuler-Hintz for plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 8 10 Plaintiff, v. 9 Case No. 2:16-cv-00866-GMN-PAL ORDER BDJ INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al. (Subst Atty – ECF No. 50) Defendants. 11 12 This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 50). Dana 13 Jonathon Nitz and Kristine A. O’Quinn of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP seek leave to be substituted 14 in the place and stead of Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz and Thomas Beckom of McCarthy & Holthus, 15 LLP for Plaintiff US Bank National Association. LR IA 11-6(c) provides that the signature of an 16 attorney to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial 17 proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order.” LR IA 11-6(d) also 18 provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial 19 proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.” 20 administratively stayed. This case is currently 21 Having reviewed and considered the matter, 22 IT IS ORDERED: 23 1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF Nos. 50) is GRANTED. 24 2. Dana Jonathon Nitz and Kristin A. O’Quinn of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP are 25 substituted in the place of Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz and Thomas Beckom of McCarthy 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 & Holthus, for plaintiff US Bank National Association subject to the provisions of LR IA 2 11-6(c) and (d). 3 Dated this 21st day of September, 2017. 4 5 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?