Gal v. Nye County Nevada et al

Filing 19

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 18 the parties' stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order is DENIED without prejudice. The parties must meet and confer and file a revised stipulated discovery plan that complies with Local Rules 26-1(b)(7)-( 9 ) by 9/3/16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by 9/3/16, the attorneys in this case must file certifications stating that they have read Local Rule 26-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/23/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

JASAN GAL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NYE COUNTY, NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:16-cv-00868-JAD-CWH
ORDER

12
13

On July 29, 2016, the court entered a minute order (ECF No. 15) denying without prejudice

14

the parties’ stipulated discovery plan because it did not comply with Local Rule 26-1. The court

15

required the parties to meet and confer and to file a revised stipulated discovery plan that complies

16

with Local Rule 26-1. The parties then filed a revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling

17

order (ECF No. 16), which was denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 26-1(b). The parties

18

were then ordered (ECF No. 17) to meet and confer and to file a revised stipulated discovery plan

19

and scheduling order.

20

The parties have now submitted a further revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling

21

order (ECF No. 18) that does not comply with Local Rules 26-1(b)(7)-(9).

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ stipulated discovery plan and scheduling

2

order (ECF No. 18) is DENIED without prejudice. The parties must meet and confer and file a

3

revised stipulated discovery plan that complies with Local Rules 26-1(b)(7)-(9) by September 3,

4

2016.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by September 3, 2016, the attorneys in this case must file

6

certifications stating that they have read Local Rule 26-1. The attorneys are advised that the court’s

7

local rules were amended effective May 1, 2016.

8
9

DATED: August 23, 2016

10
11
12

______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2