Gal v. Nye County Nevada et al
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Compel without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 02/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
NYE COUNTY, NEVADA, et al,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00868-JAD-CWH
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 39), filed on February 8,
2017. Defendant has not filed a response.
Under Local Rule 26-7(b), all motions to compel discovery must set forth in full the text of
the discovery originally sought and any response to it. Local Rule 26-7(c) further requires that
motions to compel will not be considered unless they include a declaration setting forth the details
and results of the meet and confer conference for each disputed discovery request.
Plaintiff has not certified an attempt to meet and confer with Defendant regarding the
disputed discovery material. Nor has he provided details of the results of the conference. In order to
determine the nature and extent of the dispute, the Court requires a description of each disputed
discovery request along with an explanation of the status of the dispute after the meet and confer
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 39) is DENIED
DATED: February 10, 2017.
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?