Robinson v. Dungarvin Nevada, LLC

Filing 46

ORDER striking 43 Motion for Monetary Relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) Modified on 5/1/2017 (JM).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

JAMES E. ROBINSON,

8
9
10
11

v.

Case No. 2:16-cv-00902-JAD-PAL
Plaintiff,

ORDER
(Mot Monetary Relief – ECF No. 43)

DUNGARVIN NEVADA, LLC,
Defendant.

12

Before the court is Pro Se Plaintiff James E. Robinson’s Computation of Compensatory

13

Civil Damages (ECF No. 43). The document is listed as a Motion for Monetary Relief on the

14

docket. However, after reviewing the document it appears this is plaintiff’s computation of

15

damages pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A)(iii).

16

Local Rule 26-8 states, in pertinent part:

17

19

Unless the court orders otherwise, written discovery, including discovery requests,
discovery responses, deposition notices, and deposition transcripts, must not be
filed with the court. Originals of responses to written discovery requests must be
served on the party who served the discovery request, and that party must make the
originals available at the pretrial hearing, a trial, or when ordered by the court.

20

As such, the motion for monetary relief will be construed as a Rule 26(a) computation of

18

21
22
23
24

damages disclosure and stricken from the docket. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Monetary Relief (ECF No. 43) is construed as a
discovery disclosure and STRICKEN.
DATED this 28th day of April, 2017.

25
26
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1