Old Republic Insurance Company v. City Plan Development, Inc., et al
Filing
115
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 78 defendants' motion be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
11
Case No. 2:16-CV-903 JCM (NJK)
ORDER
v.
CITY PLAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. dba
SAVI CONSTRUCTION, et al.,
Defendant(s).
12
13
Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for determination of funds to be held.
14
15
(ECF No. 78).
On July 21, 2017, the parties in this case submitted a stipulation continuing the August 7,
16
17
18
19
20
2017, trial date because “[t]he parties reached a settlement at the May 4, 2017 settlement
conference” and “[t]he parties anticipate they will need an additional ninety (90) days to finalize a
written settlement agreement and for the parties to thereafter complete the settlement terms.” (ECF
No. 114 at 1–2).
In light of that filing, it appears the instant motion is moot, and the court will consequently
21
22
23
deny the request. Thompson v. Hous. Auth. of City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir.
1986) (“District courts have inherent power to control their dockets.”).
Should settlement ultimately prove unsuccessful, defendants may reassert the motion—
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
incorporating updated, contemporary facts—within fourteen (14) days of the date of submission
of notice to the court that the case will proceed without settlement.
...
...
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants’ motion
3
4
5
6
(ECF No. 78) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, in accordance with the foregoing.
DATED July 26, 2017.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?