Bank of America, N.A. v. Los Prados Community Association, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 24 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Charles L. Geisendorf of Geisendorf & Vilkin is substituted in the place of Michael Bohn of the Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn for Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 5328 Lochmor, subject to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 8 9 10 Case No. 2:16-cv-00917-RFB-PAL Plaintiff, v. ORDER (Subst Atty – ECF No. 24) LOS PRADOS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. 11 Defendants. 12 This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorneys (ECF No. 24). Charles L. 13 Geisendorf of Geisendorf & Vilkin seeks leave to be substituted in the place of Michael Bohn of 14 the Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, for Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 5328 Lochmor. LR 15 IA 11-6(c) provides that the signature of an attorney to substitute in a case “constitutes an express 16 acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, 17 or in any court order.” LR IA 11-6(d) also provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not 18 alone be reason for delay of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.” 19 Having reviewed and considered the matter, 20 IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 24) is GRANTED. 22 2. Charles L. Geisendorf of Geisendorf & Vilkin is substituted in the place of Michael 23 Bohn of the Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn for Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 24 5328 Lochmor, subject to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(c) and (d). 25 DATED this 7th day of August, 2017. 26 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?