LHF Productions, Inc. v. DOES 1 -11

Filing 31

ORDER that 28 Stipulated Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order is DENIED. The parties shall file a new stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the Local Rules, no later than November 4, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/28/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5
6

LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

7

Plaintiff(s),

8

vs.

9

QUINTON BRITTON, et al.,

10

Defendant(s).

11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:16-cv-00924-GMN-NJK
ORDER

12

Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling

13

order. Docket No. 28. The dates in the proposed discovery plan exceed the presumptively

14

reasonable time limits set forth in the Local Rules by approximately six months. See LR 26-1(b).

15

Additionally, if the parties need extra time for discovery, they must request special scheduling

16

review and explain why longer or different time periods should apply to the case. See LR 26-1(a).

17

Finally, the plan does not contain a certification that the parties discussed whether they intend to

18

present evidence in electronic format to jurors for the purposes of jury deliberations. See LR 26-

19

1(b)(9).

20

Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and

21

scheduling order (Docket No. 28). The parties shall file a new stipulated proposed discovery plan

22

and scheduling order that complies with the Local Rules, no later than November 4, 2016.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

DATED: October 28, 2016

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge