Coleman v. Colvin

Filing 26

ORDER Adopting and Affirming the Magistrate Judge's 25 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Remand or for Reversal is Denied. Defendant's 23 Cross-Motion to Affirm is Granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 5/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 VIKKI L. COLEMAN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 14 Case No. 2:16-CV-00954-KJD-NJK Defendant. ORDER 15 16 17 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#25) of Magistrate 18 Judge Nancy J. Koppe entered March 29, 2017, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand or 19 for Reversal (#22) be denied and that the Cross-motion to Affirm (#23) be granted. Though the time 20 for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. 21 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 22 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation 23 (#25) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered March 29, 2017, should be ADOPTED and 24 AFFIRMED. 25 26 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#25) entered March 29, 2017, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED; 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand or for Reversal (#22) is DENIED; 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross-motion to Affirm (#23) is GRANTED; 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant 5 6 and against Plaintiff. DATED this 4th day of May 2017. 7 8 9 10 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?