Ocasio v. Perez et al

Filing 3

ORDER No later than 6/6/2016, Plaintiff shall file notice indicating whether he intends to continue proceeding with this case or whether he intends to have case dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/23/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 ALEXANDER OCASIO, 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 17 § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff also submitted a Complaint on April 18 27, 2016. Docket No. 1-1. 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 OFFICER PEREZ, et al., 14 Defendant(s). Case No. 2:16-cv-00956-GMN-NJK ORDER 19 Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s notice of his intent to withdraw his in forma 20 pauperis application and his complaint, which is premised on Plaintiff’s contention that his action 21 is now time-barred because the Court did not grant him in forma pauperis status prior to expiration 22 of the statute of limitations. Docket No. 2. Plaintiff’s premise is faulty. For statute of limitations 23 purposes, “a complaint will be deemed filed at the time it is delivered to the clerk with an IFP 24 application, and . . . no time will be deducted from any limitations period while the application 25 awaits a ruling.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1233 (9th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the 26 pendency of Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application has no bearing on whether Plaintiff’s complaint 27 is timely. 28 1 The Court typically adheres to requests by plaintiffs to terminate their cases. In light of 2 Plaintiff’s status as a pro se litigant and the fact that his reason for seeking to end this case is 3 incorrect as a matter of law, however, the Court will afford Plaintiff an opportunity to review the 4 above reasoning and decide whether he does in fact seek to end this case. Accordingly, no later than 5 June 6, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a notice indicating whether he intends to continue proceeding with 6 this case or whether he intends to have the case dismissed. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: May 23, 2016 9 10 11 NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?