Ocasio v. Perez et al
Filing
3
ORDER No later than 6/6/2016, Plaintiff shall file notice indicating whether he intends to continue proceeding with this case or whether he intends to have case dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/23/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
ALEXANDER OCASIO,
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
17
§ 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff also submitted a Complaint on April
18
27, 2016. Docket No. 1-1.
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
OFFICER PEREZ, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
Case No. 2:16-cv-00956-GMN-NJK
ORDER
19
Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s notice of his intent to withdraw his in forma
20
pauperis application and his complaint, which is premised on Plaintiff’s contention that his action
21
is now time-barred because the Court did not grant him in forma pauperis status prior to expiration
22
of the statute of limitations. Docket No. 2. Plaintiff’s premise is faulty. For statute of limitations
23
purposes, “a complaint will be deemed filed at the time it is delivered to the clerk with an IFP
24
application, and . . . no time will be deducted from any limitations period while the application
25
awaits a ruling.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1233 (9th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the
26
pendency of Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application has no bearing on whether Plaintiff’s complaint
27
is timely.
28
1
The Court typically adheres to requests by plaintiffs to terminate their cases. In light of
2
Plaintiff’s status as a pro se litigant and the fact that his reason for seeking to end this case is
3
incorrect as a matter of law, however, the Court will afford Plaintiff an opportunity to review the
4
above reasoning and decide whether he does in fact seek to end this case. Accordingly, no later than
5
June 6, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a notice indicating whether he intends to continue proceeding with
6
this case or whether he intends to have the case dismissed.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: May 23, 2016
9
10
11
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?