Ocasio v. Perez et al

Filing 45

ORDER that the action is dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/21/2017.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

ALEXANDER OCASIO,

4
5
6
7

Plaintiff,
vs.
WILLIAM PEREZ, et al.,
Defendants.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00956-GMN-NJK
ORDER

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
On March 22, 2017, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 36). On April 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal,
(ECF No. 37), which was subsequently dismissed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (ECF
No. 41). On June 23, 2017, in light of the Ninth Circuit’s dismissal, the Court denied as moot
Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Pending Matters on Appeal, (ECF No. 38), and gave Plaintiff until
July 7, 2017 to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 43). Pursuant to the Court’s Order,
Plaintiff’s failure to file a second amended complaint by that date would result in dismissal of
Plaintiff’s claims dismissed in the Court’s March 22, 2017 Order with prejudice. (Id.). To date,
Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, nor has Plaintiff moved the Court for an
extension of time to do so. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case.
21
DATED this _____ day of December, 2017.

23
24
25

_____________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court

Page 1 of 1