Chacon v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company

Filing 37

ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/16/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 GEORGE M. RANALLI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5748 BENJAMIN J. CARMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12565 RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC 2400 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway Henderson, Nevada 89052 Telephone: (702) 477-7774 Fa cs irni le : ( 7 0 2 ) 4 7 7 - 7 7 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA Case No. GERARDO CHACON 2:16-cv-00965-RFB-VCF Plaintiff, v. 15 17 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; ROE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES I through X, inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IT 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, IS HEREBY GERARDO STIPULATED AND CHACON, AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, attorneys of record, and AGREED, Defendants, by STATE and between FARM MUTUAL , by and through their respective that all Plaintiff's claims in this matter against the Defendants, be dismissed with prejudice, with each of the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs herein 23 24 incurred. 1 1 2 It is Further Stipulated that any Trial Currently Scheduled, be Vacated. 3 4 Dated: October , 2017 Dated: 5 Octoberl..?1 2017 G. DALLAS HORTON & ASSOCIATES RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, 6 7 8 DAVID RANALLI, ESQ. ada Bar No. 5748 ENJAMIN J. CARMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12565 2400 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway Henderson, Nevada 89052 Attorneys for Defendant ~MAS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3172 4435 South Eastern Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Attorney for Plaintiff ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: October 16, 2017. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?