Santana v. Wal-Mart, et al

Filing 6

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file their Certificates as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than July 8, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 06/28/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MAGGIE J. SANTANA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WALMART STORES, INC., ) ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-00973-GMN-GWF ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file Certificates as to Interested Parties 14 as required by LR 7.1-1. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on April 29, 15 2016. LR 7.1-1 requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must, 16 upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or 17 corporations, known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the 18 names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there 19 are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect 20 must be filed. To date, the parties’ have failed to comply. Accordingly, 21 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file their Certificates as to Interested Parties, which 22 fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than July 8, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance 23 of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 24 DATED this 28th day of June, 2016. 25 26 27 28 _______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?