Santana v. Wal-Mart, et al
Filing
6
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file their Certificates as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than July 8, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 06/28/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MAGGIE J. SANTANA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WALMART STORES, INC.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00973-GMN-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file Certificates as to Interested Parties
14
as required by LR 7.1-1. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on April 29,
15
2016. LR 7.1-1 requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must,
16
upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or
17
corporations, known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the
18
names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there
19
are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect
20
must be filed. To date, the parties’ have failed to comply. Accordingly,
21
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file their Certificates as to Interested Parties, which
22
fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than July 8, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance
23
of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
24
DATED this 28th day of June, 2016.
25
26
27
28
_______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?