Bahrampour v. United States of America

Filing 16

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; 8 Motion for Declaratory Relief; 9 Motion for Hearing; 11 Motion to Enforce 1st Amendment; 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; 13 Motion to Order the Commissioner of Patents; 14 Motion Seeking Declaratory Relief; and 15 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 09/15/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

2

***

3
4

AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR,
Case No. 2:16–cv–985–GMN–VCF

Plaintiff,
5

vs.

6

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ORDER

7

Defendant.

8
9
10
11
12

In May 2016, Bahrampour initiated this action by filing an application to proceed in forma
pauperis and a complaint. (ECF No. 1) This court granted Bahrampour’s application, but
recommended that his complaint be dismissed. (ECF No. 2) This court also ordered Bahrampour to
show cause why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant. (Id.) Bahrampour objected to this

13

court’s recommendation that his action be dismissed. (ECF No. 3) That recommendation is still
14
15
16
17

pending before the district judge. (ECF No. 2)
On June 6, 2016, this court held a show cause hearing. (ECF No. 4) Bahrampour did not appear
at this hearing nor did he file a written response. (ECF No. 5) This court recommended that

18

Bahrampour be deemed a vexatious litigant. (Id.) This recommendation is also pending before the

19

district judge.

20

Before the court are the following motions:

21

1) Motion for interlocutory injunction (ECF No. 6);

22

2) Motion for declaratory relief (ECF No. 8);

23
24

3) Motion for a hearing (ECF No. 9);
4) Motion to enforce 1st amendment (ECF No. 11);

25

1

1
2

5) Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12);
6) Motion to order the commissioner of patents (ECF No. 13);

3

7) Motion seeking declaratory relief (ECF No. 14);

4

8) Application for default judgment (ECF No. 15

5

Given the nature of the two pending recommendations, Bahrampour’s motions are denied.

6

ACCORDINGLY, and for good cause shown,

7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following motions are DENIED:

8
9
10
11

1) Motion for interlocutory injunction (ECF No. 6);
2) Motion for declaratory relief (ECF No. 8);
3) Motion for a hearing (ECF No. 9);
4) Motion to enforce 1st amendment (ECF No. 11);

12
13
14
15
16

5) Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12);
6) Motion to order the commissioner of patents (ECF No. 13);
7) Motion seeking declaratory relief (ECF No. 14);
8) Application for default judgment (ECF No. 15

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

DATED this 15th day of September, 2016.

19
20

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25

2