Jackson v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 54

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Judge Koppe's 53 report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. Plaintiff Robert Jackson's 34 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 ROBERT JACKSON 5 6 7 8 Case No. 2:16-cv-00995-APG-NJK Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF. NOS. 34, 53) 9 10 On April 3, 2018, Magistrate Judge Koppe entered a report and recommendation that I 11 deny without prejudice plaintiff Robert Jackson’s motion for temporary restraining order because 12 he did not address or establish all factors needed obtain a restraining order. ECF No. 53. Jackson 13 did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 14 recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 15 determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 16 made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 17 district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 18 objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation (ECF 20 No. 53) is accepted. Plaintiff Robert Jackson’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 21 34) is DENIED without prejudice. 22 DATED this 26th day of April, 2018. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?