Jackson v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
54
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Judge Koppe's 53 report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. Plaintiff Robert Jackson's 34 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
ROBERT JACKSON
5
6
7
8
Case No. 2:16-cv-00995-APG-NJK
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ON REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
(ECF. NOS. 34, 53)
9
10
On April 3, 2018, Magistrate Judge Koppe entered a report and recommendation that I
11
deny without prejudice plaintiff Robert Jackson’s motion for temporary restraining order because
12
he did not address or establish all factors needed obtain a restraining order. ECF No. 53. Jackson
13
did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and
14
recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo
15
determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is
16
made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the
17
district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if
18
objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).
19
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation (ECF
20
No. 53) is accepted. Plaintiff Robert Jackson’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No.
21
34) is DENIED without prejudice.
22
DATED this 26th day of April, 2018.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?