Bank of America, N.A. v. South Valley Ranch Community Association, et al

Filing 35

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that HASI must retain a new attorney and that attorney must file a notice of appearance by 5/17/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 6 7 8 9 10 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SOUTH VALLEY RANCH COMMUNITY ) ASSOCIATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-01013-KJD-CWH ORDER 11 12 On March 20, 2017, the court entered an order granting attorney Wolfe Thompson’s Motion 13 to Withdraw as Attorney for Homeowner Association Services, Inc. (“HASI”). (Order (ECF No. 14 31).) The court’s order advised HASI that because it is a corporation, it cannot represent itself and 15 must be represented by an attorney in this action. (Id.) The order further required HASI to retain a 16 new attorney and stated that the new attorney must file a notice of appearance by April 10, 2017. 17 (Id.) The court advised HASI that failure to retain an attorney may result in the imposition of 18 sanctions under Local Rule IA 11-8. (Id.) HASI was served with a copy of the court’s order by 19 attorney Wolfe Thompson. (Cert. of Service (ECF No. 32).) 20 To date, a new attorney has not filed a notice of appearance on behalf of HASI. HASI must 21 retain a new attorney and that attorney must file a notice of appearance by May 17, 2017. Failure 22 to comply with this order will result in the issuance of an order to show cause and may result in the 23 imposition of additional sanctions under Local Rule IA 11-8 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 16(f)(1)(C). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: April 19, 2017 27 28 ______________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?