Bank of America, N.A. v. South Valley Ranch Community Association, et al

Filing 49

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 46 Defendant Hitchen Post Dr. Trust's Motion to Lift Stay is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that stipulations, motions to modify the discovery plan and scheduling order, or in the absence of such stipulations or motions, dispositive motions are due within forty-five (45) days after the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Case No. 2:16-cv-01013-KJD-CWH

8
9
10
11

Plaintiff,
v.
SOUTH VALLEY RANCH COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Defendants.

12
13

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendant Hitchen Post Dr. Trust’s Motion to Lift Stay

14

(#46). Though the time for doing so has passed, no response in opposition has been filed.

15

I. Background and Analysis

16

This case emerges from the non-judicial foreclosure sale by Defendant South Valley

17

Ranch Community Association on or about February 13, 2014 of the property located at 733

18

Hitchen Post Drive, Henderson, Nevada 89011 (“the Property”). This case shares a similar fact

19

pattern with many cases currently pending before this Court, all having to do with HOA

20

foreclosure sales. One of the issues before the Court centers in whole or in part around the

21

question of what notice of default the foreclosing party was required to provide Plaintiff prior to

22

its foreclosure sale on the Property. After the Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in SFR Invs.

23

Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, the Ninth Circuit decided Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo

24

Bank, NA, 832 F.3d 1154, 1160 (9th Cir. 2016) (holding NRS 115.3116(2)’s statutory notice

25

scheme was facially unconstitutional).

26

On April 21, 2017, in Bank of New York Mellon v. Star Hills Homeowners Ass’n, this

27

Court certified the following question to the Nevada Supreme Court: “Whether NRS §

28

116.31168(1)’s incorporation of NRS § 107.090 requires homeowners associations to provide

1

notices of default to banks even when a bank does not request notice?” Bank of New York

2

Mellon v. Star Hill Homeowners Ass’n, 2017 WL 1439671, at *5 (D. Nev. April 21, 2017).
In granting certification, the Court reasoned the following: In Bourne Valley, the Ninth

3
4

Circuit definitively answered the question that the statute’s “opt-in” framework was

5

unconstitutional. Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 832 F.3d 1154, 1160 (9th

6

Cir. 2016). However, that left the Court with the unresolved question of what notice must be

7

provided. “It is solely within the province of the state courts to authoritatively construe state

8

legislation.” Cal. Teachers Ass’n v. State Bd. of Educ., 271 F.3d 1141, 1146 (9th Cir. 2001). As

9

such, state law questions of first impression like this one should be resolved by the state’s

10

highest court. See Huddleston v. Dwyer, 322 U.S. 232, 237 (1944).
On August 2, 2018, the Supreme Court of Nevada answered the certified question. See

11
12

SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 422 P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018). Further, it has

13

since issued two new opinions that bear on the issues in this action. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

14

v. Tim Radecki, 2018 WL 4402403 (Nev. September 13, 2018); Bank of America, N.A. v. SFR

15

Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 2018 WL 4403296 (Nev. September 13, 2018) (tender of the superpriority

16

amount prior to foreclosure results in buyer taking property subject to deed of trust). Also, since

17

the action was stayed, opinions in several cases have directly addressed the Federal Foreclosure

18

Bar issues in this action. See Berezovsky v. Moniz, 869 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 2017); Elmer v.

19

JPMorgan Chase & Co., 707 Fed. Appx. 426 (9th Cir. 2017); Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. SFR

20

Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 396 P.3d 754 (Nev. 2017).

21

A. Stay of the Case

22

A district court has the inherent power to stay cases to control its docket and promote the

23

efficient use of judicial resources. Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S., 248, 254-55 (1936);

24

Dependable Highway Exp., Inc. v. Navigators Ins. Co., 498 F.3d 1059, 1066 (9th Cir. 200). The

25

only objection the parties had to lifting the stay was the pending certified question. A stay is no

26

longer necessary in this action where the certified question has already been decided.

27

///

28

///

-2-

1

B. Briefing Schedule

2

The parties may either file a stipulation or move the Court for a modified discovery plan

3

and scheduling order as necessary. If the parties fail to do so, dispositive motions are due no later

4

than forty-five (45) days after the entry of this order. Further, the request to refile motions that

5

were previously denied without prejudice is denied. Any future dispositive motions must address

6

the most recent case law applicable to the issues in this action.

7

II. Conclusion

8
9
10

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hitchen Post Dr. Trust’s
Motion to Lift Stay (#46) is GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that stipulations, motions to modify the discovery plan and

11

scheduling order, or in the absence of such stipulations or motions, dispositive motions are due

12

within forty-five (45) days after the entry of this order.

13

Dated this 16th day of October, 2018.

14
15
16

_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-