NAC Foundation, LLC v. Jodoin

Filing 46

ORDER that the 40 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice for NAC Foundation's failure to maintain counsel and obey the Court's orders. All remaining 41 , 43 , and 44 motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk's Office shall enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk's Office shall send a copy of this order and the judgment to the Plaintiff (see Order for addresses). Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7

NAC FOUNDATION, LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COREY JODOIN,
Defendant.

8
9

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:16-cv-01039-GMN-VCF
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States

10

Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, (ECF No. 40), which recommends that Plaintiff NAC

11

Foundation, LLC’s case be dismissed with prejudice for failure to maintain counsel and obey

12

the Court’s orders.

13

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a

14

United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);

15

D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo

16

determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,

17

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

18

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is

19

not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an

20

objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized

21

that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

22

where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

23

1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

24

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.

25

Accordingly,
Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 40), is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for NAC
Foundation’s failure to maintain counsel and obey the Court’s orders.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions (ECF Nos. 41, 43, and 44)
are DENIED as moot.

7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk’s Office shall enter judgment accordingly.

8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk’s Office shall send a copy of this order

9

and the judgment to the Plaintiff at the following addresses:

10

NAC Foundation, LLC

11

c/o Marcus Andrade

12

7495 W. Azure, Suite 110

13

Las Vegas, Nevada 89130

14
15

NAC Foundation, LLC

16

c/o Robert C. Harris, Registered Agent

17

564 Wedge Lane

18

Fernley, NV 89408

19
20

2
DATED this ________ day of April, 2018.

21
22
23

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court

24
25

Page 2 of 2